Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Votre réponse est trop courte et manque de détails. Donnez une phrase d'ouverture claire, puis ajoutez des précisions (pourquoi, alternatives, ou une courte anecdote) en utilisant des connecteurs. Évitez la répétition et gardez 2–4 phrases au maximum.

예시: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child. Instead, I usually walked to school because my family lived nearby. However, I sometimes borrowed a bicycle from a neighbour for short rides on weekends.

제안: Réponse trop brève et répétitive. Donnez d'abord votre opinion directe, puis expliquez-la avec des raisons spécifiques (par ex. infrastructures, climat, coût) en utilisant un lien logique comme «because» ou «however». Restreignez-vous à 2–4 phrases.

예시: No, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because most people prefer cars for long distances and there are few dedicated cycling lanes. However, cycling is becoming more common in some cities where governments are investing in bike paths.

× No, I didn't have.

✓ No, I didn't.

The student used an incomplete verb phrase. In responses to 'Did you have a bike when you were a child?' the correct short negative answer uses the auxiliary only: 'No, I didn't.' The original 'I didn't have' is acceptable in some contexts if followed by an object (e.g. 'I didn't have one'), but as a standalone reply it is unnatural and incomplete. Suggestion: use 'No, I didn't.' or 'No, I didn't have one.'

× No, actually, no.

✓ No, not really.

The reply 'No, actually, no.' is colloquial and repetitive. For the question 'Do you think bikes are popular in your country?' a more natural conversational negative is 'No, not really.' which clearly conveys that bikes are not very popular. Suggestion: use 'No, not really.' or 'No, I don't think so.'