Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Be consistent and natural in tense and word choice. Start with a direct topic sentence that answers the question, then give one or two brief supporting details. Avoid contradictory statements ("no" vs "I had a bicycle") and unnecessary repetition. Use past tense for childhood and a linking phrase to add a short detail.

예시: Yes. I had a bicycle when I was a child. It was a small red bike that I used to ride to school and around the neighborhood, and I learned to balance on it by practicing every afternoon.

제안: Make the answer more concise and correct grammar. Begin with a clear topic sentence, then give one or two specific reasons linked logically. Replace awkward phrases ("there are a bike is cheaper") with correct constructions and use linking words like "because" or "therefore" appropriately. Add a brief example or consequence to support the point.

예시: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because they are much cheaper than cars and cost less to maintain. For example, many people use motorcycles for commuting in cities since fuel and parking are expensive, so bikes remain an affordable choice.

× No, I have no bike.

✓ No, I did not have a bike.

The question asks about the past (when you were a child). The original sentence uses present simple 'have', which is tense-inappropriate. Use past simple 'did not have' to match the time frame. Suggestion: use past tense verbs when referring to past time expressions such as 'when I was a child'.

× When I was a child I had a bicycle.

✓ When I was a child, I had a bicycle.

The sentence is grammatically correct in tense but needs a comma after the introductory time clause for clarity and natural written style. Ensure punctuation after introductory adverbial phrases. Suggestion: place a comma after 'When I was a child' for readability.

× Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because there are a bike is cheaper than cars, so it's affordable.

✓ Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because a bike is cheaper than a car, so it is more affordable.

Multiple issues fall under quantifiers and article use: 'there are a bike' is ungrammatical and mixes plural 'are' with singular 'a bike'; 'cars' should be singular to compare one bike with one car; 'it's' is vague—use 'it is' or 'a bike is' and add 'more' to make the comparison clear. According to the allowed types, correct using quantifiers/articles and comparison structure: use 'a bike is cheaper than a car' and 'so it is more affordable.' Suggestion: keep number agreement and clear comparative phrasing when comparing two items.

× So that's why bikes are very popular.

✓ That is why bikes are very popular.

Beginning with 'So' is redundant after the previous sentence which already states the reason. This is primarily a sentence structure/style issue: remove unnecessary linking word and slightly formalize to 'That is why...'. Suggestion: avoid redundant discourse markers and use concise linking expressions.