Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Improve grammar, clarity and coherence. Start with a clear topic sentence directly answering the question, use correct verb tense and articles, and keep it concise (max 3–4 short sentences). Add one specific supporting detail. Use linking words if adding extra information.

예시: Yes, I did. I had a tricycle when I was a child because it felt safer and easier to balance. Later, I learned to ride a two-wheeler with my father's help, which was a big milestone for me.

제안: Give a direct opinion first, then provide clear, specific reasons with correct vocabulary and simple linking words. Correct word choice (e.g., 'roads', 'pedestrian paths', 'bike lanes') and sentence structure will make your answer clearer. Limit to 3–4 sentences and include one specific example or consequence.

예시: No, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because bike lanes and pedestrian paths are often too narrow and unsafe. For example, busy roads lack a separate lane for cyclists, so many people prefer cars or motorcycles instead.

× When I was a child that I have advice a bike before but it's not a very normal buy.

✓ When I was a child I had a bike before, but it wasn't a very common purchase; it was a tricycle.

The original sentence has multiple structural and tense issues: 'that I have advice a bike' is ungrammatical and mixes present perfect with an incorrect relative/connector 'that'. The correct simple past 'I had' matches the time frame 'When I was a child'. 'Advice' is the wrong word; likely intended 'had' or 'owned'. 'Buy' should be a noun 'purchase' or the verb form in context; here 'wasn't a very common purchase' is appropriate. Also add clarification 'it was a tricycle' to show contrast. Suggestion: use simple past for past events, choose correct vocabulary (had/owned instead of advice), and use appropriate nouns ('purchase') or verb phrases ('it wasn't commonly bought').

× It's a tricycle.

✓ It was a tricycle.

The student is describing a past situation ('When I was a child'), so the verb should be in the past tense 'was' rather than the present 'is'. This is a tense consistency issue; use past tense to match the context. Note: this also relates to keeping tense consistent across connected sentences.

× I don't think bikes are popular in my country because the pedestrian Rd. the pedestrian path and the bike and the bicycle path is too narrow for us.

✓ I don't think bikes are popular in my country because the pedestrian road, the pedestrian path, and the bicycle path are too narrow for us.

There are several problems: inconsistent and redundant noun phrases ('pedestrian Rd.' and 'pedestrian path' and 'bike and the bicycle path') and a subject-verb agreement error: multiple paths form a plural subject and require the plural verb 'are' rather than 'is'. Also prefer consistent vocabulary ('bicycle path' rather than 'bike path' plus 'and the'). Suggestion: list items clearly separated by commas and use plural verb for plural subject; avoid unnecessary repetition and use full words rather than abbreviations.