Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Be more concise and correct grammar. Start with a clear topic sentence, then add one or two specific supporting details using linking words. Avoid generalizations and fix verb agreement and word choice (e.g., ‘have’ → ‘had’, ‘necessary skill to know how to cycle’ → ‘useful for getting around’).

예시: Yes, I had a bike as a child. In Vietnam most children learn to ride early, and my bike helped me travel to school and play with friends after classes.

제안: Correct vocabulary and organize the answer: give a direct opinion, then two specific reasons linked logically. Avoid typos (‘banks’ → ‘bikes’) and awkward phrases (‘use fees for transport’). Use linking words like ‘because’ and ‘so’ properly and watch punctuation to improve clarity.

예시: Yes, bikes and motorbikes are very popular in Vietnam because roads in many cities are narrow and fuel costs are high, so people prefer smaller, cheaper vehicles. As a result, most families own at least one motorbike for daily travel.

× Yes, I did have a bike when I was a child.

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.

Using 'did have' is unnecessary when forming a simple past affirmative sentence. In English, the past simple is normally formed by the past verb alone ('had') rather than using the auxiliary 'did' plus the base verb. Use 'I had' for a natural, concise past-tense statement. Suggestion: say 'I had' for simple past affirmative sentences.

× I think everyone had a bike because this is a necessary skill to know how to cycle.

✓ I think many people had a bike because it is useful to know how to ride a bicycle.

The phrase 'everyone had a bike' is an overgeneralization; 'many people' or 'most people' is more accurate. Also, 'necessary skill to know how to cycle' is awkward: 'useful to know how to ride a bicycle' is more natural. Use 'ride' for bicycles and avoid 'necessary skill' unless you mean essential. Suggestion: use a quantifier that fits reality and a natural collocation ('ride a bicycle').

× And since I live in Vietnam, every family have at least two vehicles to transport.

✓ And since I live in Vietnam, every family has at least two vehicles for transport.

The subject 'every family' is singular, so the verb must be singular: 'has' not 'have'. Also, 'to transport' is not the correct noun phrase here; 'for transport' or 'for transportation' is natural. Suggestion: match singular subjects with singular verbs and choose the correct prepositional phrase.

× Yes, as I said earlier, banks are pretty popular in Vietnam since they use fees for transport a lot because roads here are not big enough to fit a car so they often just use motorbikes or bikes.

✓ Yes, as I said earlier, bikes are very popular in Vietnam because they are used for transport a lot; roads here are not wide enough for cars, so people often use motorbikes or bicycles.

The original sentence has a pronoun error and a wrong noun: 'banks' should be 'bikes'. Pronoun 'they' was unclear and repeated awkwardly. Also 'not big enough to fit a car' is better as 'not wide enough for cars'. Use 'people' as the subject when referring to general users. Suggestion: replace incorrect nouns, clarify pronouns, and use natural collocations like 'wide enough for cars' and 'bicycles' instead of 'bikes' for formality.'