Parks— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Focus on listening carefully to the examiner and answer the exact question. Your reply shows you misheard “parks” as “Paris.” To improve, practice minimal-pair listening and slow down before answering to ensure you understood. Also give a clear topic sentence and one or two supporting details (max 5 sentences).

예시: Yes, I liked going to parks as a child. I often played on the swings and had picnics with my family, which made those outings very memorable.

제안: Here you repeated the examiner’s question instead of answering. Train yourself to respond immediately with a direct sentence that states your opinion, then add one supporting detail using a linking word (for example, because or so). Keep answers concise and relevant.

예시: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks because they help me relax and exercise. For instance, I usually jog there on weekends and sometimes read under a tree.

제안: Again you misheard “parks” as “parts.” Improve listening accuracy and vocabulary recognition by practicing common topic words (parks, gardens, playgrounds). When answering, state your position then explain why with one or two specific reasons.

예시: Yes, I would like to see more parks in the city because they provide green space for families and improve air quality. For example, a new park near my neighborhood would be great for children to play safely.

제안: You misheard “parks” again and repeated the examiner’s question. Work on active listening and avoid echoing the question. Answer directly: name a park (or type of park) and give a brief reason or plan for visiting. Use linking words like because or so to make it coherent.

예시: Yes, I would like to visit the new botanical gardens next year because I enjoy seeing different plant species. In addition, I heard they have a lovely greenhouse that I want to explore.

× Did you like going to Paris as a child?

✓ Did you like going to parks as a child?

The student used 'Paris' instead of 'parks', which is a lexical error rather than grammar, but it changes the meaning and does not match the examiner's question. To correct, replace the incorrect noun with the intended plural noun 'parks' to match context. Suggestion: listen carefully to the examiner's word choice and repeat or paraphrase the same key noun to keep the conversation coherent.

× Do you still like going to parks now?

✓ Yes, I still like going to parks now.

The student's reply repeated the examiner's question rather than answering. This is not a grammatical form error but a pragmatic error: a question requires an answer. To correct, provide a present-tense statement that matches the question (using simple present 'like' for current habitual preference). Suggestion: when asked 'Do you still...?', respond with 'Yes, I still...' or 'No, I don't...' and give a reason.

× Would you like to see more parts in the city?

✓ Would you like to see more parks in the city?

The student used 'parts' instead of 'parks', a wrong lexical choice caused by a mishearing of the examiner. This alters meaning and is not the intended word. Replace with 'parks' to match the examiner's question. Suggestion: clarify or repeat the examiner's question if unsure of a word, and use the correct noun to answer appropriately.

× Are there any parts you want to go to in the future?

✓ Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?

Again the student used 'parts' instead of 'parks', producing an incorrect noun that makes the sentence semantically wrong. Change to 'parks' to match the examiner's original question. Suggestion: focus on listening for minimal pairs and similar-sounding words; if uncertain, ask 'Did you say parks?' before answering.