Parks— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Your answer is too brief and does not directly respond. Give a clear opinion with a short topic sentence, then add one or two specific supporting details using linking words. Keep it under five sentences and use relevant vocabulary (e.g., playground, picnic, trees).

예시: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. For example, I often played on the swings and had picnics with my family, which made weekends very enjoyable.

제안: Avoid one-word answers. State your current preference clearly, then support it with specific reasons or examples using linking words like because or although. Aim for natural phrasing and stay within five sentences.

예시: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks because they are peaceful and good for exercising. For instance, I usually go jogging there twice a week and sometimes meet friends for coffee.

제안: Provide a direct opinion about whether you want more parks, and explain why with concrete reasons (e.g., health, environment, community). Use linking words such as so or therefore to connect ideas and keep the answer concise.

예시: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because they improve air quality and provide recreational space. Therefore, more parks would encourage people to spend time outdoors and strengthen community ties.

제안: Instead of saying 'I don't know', mention a specific park or type of park and explain why you want to visit it, using linking words like because or for example. Be specific about features you are interested in (e.g., botanical gardens, lakes).

예시: I would like to visit the central botanical garden next summer because it has rare plant collections and a large lake. For example, I am interested in seeing the seasonal flower displays and taking photos by the water.

× I don't know

✓ I don't know.

The student's responses are grammatically correct short answers but pragmatically inappropriate for the questions. The issue is not a grammatical form error listed in the provided types but a sentence structure/response appropriateness problem: the student repeatedly gives the same ambiguous reply to questions asking about preferences and future plans. Suggestion: provide context-appropriate full answers that match the question tense and meaning. For example, for 'Did you like going to parks as a child?' answer 'Yes, I liked going to parks when I was a child.' (past tense). For 'Do you still like going to parks now?' answer 'Yes, I still like going to parks.' (present simple). For 'Would you like to see more parks in your city?' answer 'Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city.' (conditional/modal 'would'). For 'Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?' answer 'Yes, there are some parks I want to visit in the future.' (present simple + future intention). These corrections match the question tenses and provide clear, specific responses.