Parks— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Your response is incorrect and off-topic: you repeated the examiner's question but changed a key word (“parks” to “pubs”), which confuses meaning. For Part 1 you should answer directly with a short, natural statement (1–3 sentences) and provide one brief supporting detail. Also avoid repeating the question as your reply.

예시: Yes, I liked going to parks as a child. I often went there with my family to play on the swings and have picnics, which I always enjoyed.

제안: You simply repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. This gives no content to evaluate. Give a clear topic sentence (yes/no or short opinion) and add one or two specific reasons or an example using a linking word (for example, because/since/so). Keep it concise and natural.

예시: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks because they help me relax and exercise. For example, I often go jogging there on weekends to clear my mind.

제안: Again you repeated the question without answering. Provide a direct response (yes/no or maybe) and give a specific reason or suggestion, connected with a linking word such as because or so. Limit to a few sentences and avoid repetition of the question form.

예시: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because green spaces improve air quality and provide places for families to relax. For instance, new small pocket parks near apartment blocks would be very useful.

제안: You repeated the question instead of answering; also there is a small grammar omission (“to go in the future” should be “to go to in the future”). Answer directly with a named park or type of park and give a brief reason or plan using a linking word (for example, because/so).

예시: Yes, I would like to visit the botanical garden next year because it has rare plants and guided tours. I hope to go there with friends when the weather is nice.

× Did you like going to pubs as a child?

✓ Did you like going to parks as a child?

The student repeated the examiner's question incorrectly by using 'pubs' instead of 'parks'. This is a vocabulary/word choice error and creates a mismatch with the examiner's intent. Suggestion: listen carefully to the key word in the question and repeat or answer using the same noun; if you mishear, ask 'Sorry, did you say parks or pubs?' to confirm.

× Do you still like going to parks now?

✓ Yes, I still like going to parks now.

The student repeated the examiner's question verbatim, which is not a grammatical error but does not answer the question. Provide a full sentence answer matching the present tense: for example 'Yes, I still like going to parks now.' Suggestion: answer directly rather than repeating the question.

× Would you like to see more parks in your city?

✓ Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city.

The student repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. Grammatically the question is fine; the appropriate response should use conditional 'would' to match the question: e.g. 'Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city.' Suggestion: respond rather than repeat the question.

× Are there any parks you want to go in the future?

✓ Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?

The verb phrase 'go to' requires the preposition 'to' before a destination (park). Omitting 'to' is a preposition error (Grammar Problem Type ID 11). Suggestion: include the preposition 'to' after 'go' when indicating movement toward a place: 'go to the park.'