Part 1
시험관
Did you like going to parks as a child?
수험생
Yes, I like going to parks. When I was a child, I used to go there with my parents and ride a bike. We would eat and catch up and enjoy the beautiful scenery. We would also take photos and share them together at home.
시험관
Do you still like going to parks now?
수험생
Yes, I still enjoy going to parks whenever I'm off work. I usually go there to have a cup of coffee and enjoy the beautiful scenery. I like taking pictures of the sunset and the people around me. It makes me feel calm and relaxed after work.
시험관
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
수험생
Yes, I'd like to see more parks in the city where I can relax and enjoy. I'd like to go to a park where there are a lot of trees so that I can enjoy the breeze and breathe fresh air. And I would enjoy it going with my friends.
시험관
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
수험생
No, there is not a specific park that I would like to go to. However, I'd like to go to a park where there are a lot of trees so that I could go there with my friends and socialize. Whenever we're off work, we could hang out and catch up.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
점수: 78.0제안: Make the answer more natural by using past-tense consistently, vary vocabulary, and add one specific memory or detail. Keep it concise (max 5 sentences). Use a clear topic sentence then one or two supporting details linked with words like "for example" or "also."
예시: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. I often went with my parents and we would ride bikes around the lake; for example, I remember racing my father near the big oak tree. We also had picnics there and took photos to remember the day.
Do you still like going to parks now?
점수: 85.0제안: This answer is clear and relevant. Improve by adding a linking phrase to connect activities and a specific example of a park feature or a recent visit to make it more vivid and natural. Keep sentences varied to avoid repetition of "I" at the start.
예시: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks whenever I'm off work. Usually I sit with a cup of coffee by the pond and watch the sunset; for instance, last weekend I photographed a bright orange sky reflected on the water. These visits help me unwind and feel calm after a busy day.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
점수: 80.0제안: Answer is relevant but slightly repetitive. Combine similar ideas, use linking words (e.g., "because" or "so that"), and add a brief reason or example of activities you'd do with friends to show specificity.
예시: Yes, I would like to see more parks in the city because they provide green space to relax. For example, a tree-filled park would be ideal for weekend picnics and walks with friends, where we could chat and play casual games.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
점수: 76.0제안: Avoid beginning with a blunt negative; instead give a direct topic sentence then expand with a specific preference and a short example. Reduce repetition of ideas and vary phrasing. Use linking words like "however" or "instead" correctly.
예시: I don't have a particular park in mind, but I would like to visit one with many trees and shaded paths. For instance, a leafy park near the river would be perfect for meeting friends after work to walk, chat, and have a small picnic.
× Yes, I like going to parks.
✓ Yes, I liked going to parks.
The question asked about past preference 'Did you like going to parks as a child?' so the response should use past tense. Use 'liked' to match the time frame and maintain tense consistency. Suggestion: Match verb tense to the time reference in the question (use past for childhood).
× When I was a child, I used to go there with my parents and ride a bike.
✓ When I was a child, I used to go there with my parents and ride a bike.
No correction needed; sentence correctly uses 'used to' for habitual past action and is grammatically appropriate.
× We would eat and catch up and enjoy the beautiful scenery.
✓ We would eat, catch up, and enjoy the beautiful scenery.
The main issue is punctuation/parallel structure rather than tense. Using commas and the conjunction 'and' correctly improves clarity. 'Would' is acceptable to describe habitual past events. Suggestion: Use commas to separate items in a list and keep parallel verb forms. Note: This counts as minor sentence structure improvement under present/past narrative.
× We would also take photos and share them together at home.
✓ We would also take photos and share them at home.
'Share them together' is redundant because 'share' implies mutual action; remove 'together' for conciseness. Tense 'would' correctly indicates habitual past. Suggestion: Avoid redundant words that do not add meaning.
× Yes, I still enjoy going to parks whenever I'm off work.
✓ Yes, I still enjoy going to parks whenever I'm off work.
Sentence is correct; present tense 'enjoy' and present continuous 'I'm off work' appropriately describe current habits.
× I usually go there to have a cup of coffee and enjoy the beautiful scenery.
✓ I usually go there to have a cup of coffee and enjoy the beautiful scenery.
Sentence is correct; present simple 'usually go' suits habitual action.
× I like taking pictures of the sunset and the people around me.
✓ I like taking pictures of the sunset and of the people around me.
Original is acceptable, but adding 'of' before 'the people' improves parallelism in the prepositional phrase. 'Like taking' correctly uses verb + -ing form after 'like.' Suggestion: Keep parallel prepositional structures for clarity.
× It makes me feel calm and relaxed after work.
✓ It makes me feel calm and relaxed after work.
Correct sentence; present tense 'makes' correctly describes general effect.
× Yes, I'd like to see more parks in the city where I can relax and enjoy.
✓ Yes, I'd like to see more parks in the city where I can relax and enjoy myself.
The verb 'enjoy' typically takes an object; adding 'myself' completes the verb's meaning. 'I'd like' (would like) correctly expresses desire. Suggestion: Use an object with 'enjoy' when referring to personal enjoyment.
× I'd like to go to a park where there are a lot of trees so that I can enjoy the breeze and breathe fresh air.
✓ I'd like to go to a park where there are lots of trees so that I can enjoy the breeze and breathe fresh air.
Original is acceptable; change 'a lot of' to 'lots of' is stylistic. Subject-verb agreement 'there are' matches plural 'trees.' No grammatical error present. Suggestion: Both 'a lot of trees' and 'lots of trees' are correct; maintain consistency.
× And I would enjoy it going with my friends.
✓ And I would enjoy going with my friends.
Incorrect word order: 'enjoy it going' is ungrammatical. The correct structure is 'enjoy going' (verb + -ing) or 'enjoy it when I go.' Suggestion: Use 'enjoy' + gerund ('going') or rephrase to 'I would enjoy it if I went with my friends.'
× No, there is not a specific park that I would like to go to.
✓ No, there is not a specific park that I would like to go to.
Grammatically acceptable though more natural phrasing is 'No, there isn't a specific park I'd like to go to.' 'There is not' works but contraction improves spoken style. Suggestion: Use contraction and keep tense consistent.
× However, I'd like to go to a park where there are a lot of trees so that I could go there with my friends and socialize.
✓ However, I'd like to go to a park where there are a lot of trees so that I can go there with my friends and socialize.
Mixing 'I'd like' (present conditional) with 'could' (past/potential) creates a mismatch. Use 'can' to indicate ability/possibility in the present/future context after expressing a present desire. Suggestion: Use 'can' to match the desire to go in the future.
× Whenever we're off work, we could hang out and catch up.
✓ Whenever we're off work, we can hang out and catch up.
Using 'could' suggests hypothetical ability; 'can' is more natural to express a regular possibility or plan. If speaker means a suggestion, 'could' is acceptable, but matching modal consistency with 'can' clarifies intention. Suggestion: Use 'can' for habitual/factual possibility and 'could' for suggestions or hypothetical statements.