Part 1
試験官
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
受験者
Yes I have. I used to live in the countryside house so I needed bike to ride around my village and go and spend time with my friends. For example, I usually rode the bike.
試験官
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
受験者
From my standpoint, bikes were trendy few years ago. However, people have started choosing electric scooters instead. I believe that in the future traditional bicycles will probably disappear completely.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
スコア: 68.0提案: Use the past tense because the question asks about your childhood: say “Yes, I did,” not “Yes, I have.” Add articles where needed, such as “a countryside house” and “a bike.” The phrase “go and spend time” is slightly awkward, and “For example, I usually rode the bike” repeats the previous idea. Give one specific supporting detail instead, such as where you rode or what you did with your friends.
例: Yes, I did. I lived in a house in the countryside, so I often rode my bike around the village and to my friends’ homes. We usually cycled along the quiet roads and played together in the afternoon.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
スコア: 74.0提案: Answer in the present tense because the question asks about current popularity: use “Bikes are still quite popular” rather than “bikes were trendy.” Add an article in “a few years ago,” and replace “trendy” with the more natural “popular” in this context. Your contrast with electric scooters is effective, but the prediction that bicycles will “disappear completely” is too extreme; qualify it and explain why, for example by mentioning convenience, health, or environmental concerns.
例: Yes, bikes are still fairly popular in my country, especially among students and people who exercise regularly. However, electric scooters have become more common because they are convenient and require less physical effort. I don’t think traditional bicycles will disappear completely, since many people still use them for exercise and short journeys.
× Yes I have.
✓ Yes, I did.
The question uses the past-tense auxiliary did: Did you have a bike...? Therefore, the short answer should also use did, not have. The comma after Yes is also needed for punctuation, although it is not a grammar error from the provided list.
× I used to live in the countryside house so I needed bike to ride around my village and go and spend time with my friends.
✓ I used to live in a house in the countryside, so I needed a bike to ride around my village and spend time with my friends.
The singular countable nouns house and bike need appropriate articles. Use a house because the house is not specific, and a bike because the bike is mentioned for the first time. The phrase in the countryside is more natural than the countryside house in this context. Also, removing the second go makes the sentence more concise, but this is a style improvement rather than a required grammar correction.
× From my standpoint, bikes were trendy few years ago.
✓ From my standpoint, bikes were trendy a few years ago.
The expression a few years ago requires the article a before the plural noun phrase few years. A few means several, whereas few without a usually has a negative meaning and does not fit this sentence.