Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Câu trả lời đi đúng trọng tâm và có thêm chi tiết về tần suất, địa điểm và người đi cùng. Tuy nhiên, cần sửa lỗi ngữ pháp nghiêm trọng: dùng “I had a bike” hoặc “I bought a bike” thay vì “I had buy”; đồng thời thêm dấu ngắt hoặc từ nối để tránh câu quá dài. Bạn có thể mở đầu bằng câu trả lời trực tiếp, sau đó giải thích thói quen và hoạt động với bạn bè. Từ vựng phù hợp nhưng còn khá cơ bản.

例: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I used to ride it to school almost every day, and I sometimes went cycling with my friends in the park. It was a convenient and enjoyable way to get around.

提案: Bạn đã nêu quan điểm trực tiếp, nhưng câu trả lời có nhiều lỗi khiến ý nghĩa khó hiểu. “bias” cần sửa thành “bikes”, “universal” không phù hợp với ngữ cảnh này và nên dùng “widely popular” hoặc “common”. Cụm “the influx and public immense neutrals is very quickly raised” không tự nhiên; có thể diễn đạt là “traffic has increased” và “public transport has become more convenient”. Ngoài ra, “it’s need to more vehicle to drive” cần sửa thành “people need other forms of transport” hoặc “there are more cars on the roads”. Hãy dùng cấu trúc rõ ràng: quan điểm → lý do → ví dụ hoặc sự đối lập.

例: I think bikes are fairly popular in my country, especially among students and people who live in smaller cities. However, in large cities, many people prefer cars or motorbikes because traffic is heavy and public transport is becoming more convenient. As a result, bicycles are used more for exercise and leisure than for commuting.

× Yes, I had buy when I was a child I used to ride it to school almost every day and sometimes I rode it with my friends to the park.

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I used to ride it to school almost every day, and sometimes I rode it with my friends to the park.

The noun bike requires the indefinite article a because it refers to one unspecified bike. Also, the original answer contains two independent clauses joined without appropriate punctuation. Use a full stop or a conjunction to separate them clearly.

× From my perspective, I don't think bias are universal in my country because nowadays the influx and public immense neutrals is very quickly raised so it's need to more vehicle to drive.

✓ From my perspective, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because nowadays the use of public transportation is increasing very quickly, so people need more vehicles to drive.

The subject use of public transportation is singular, so it must be followed by is, not are. In the final clause, people is the correct plural subject, so use need rather than it's need. The noun vehicles should also be plural because more refers to more than one vehicle. Use popular instead of universal because the question asks whether bikes are commonly used.

× From my perspective, I don't think bias are universal in my country because nowadays the influx and public immense neutrals is very quickly raised so it's need to more vehicle to drive.

✓ From my perspective, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because nowadays the use of public transportation is increasing very quickly, so people need more vehicles to drive.

The quantifier more must be used with the plural countable noun vehicles in this context. The phrase more vehicle is grammatically incorrect because vehicle is countable and must be plural after more.

× From my perspective, I don't think bias are universal in my country because nowadays the influx and public immense neutrals is very quickly raised so it's need to more vehicle to drive.

✓ From my perspective, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because nowadays the use of public transportation is increasing very quickly, so people need more vehicles to drive.

The original sentence contains several clauses joined together without clear grammatical subjects and connectors. Use a complete subject and verb in each clause, and place a comma before so when it joins two independent clauses.