Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: 回答基本清晰，也提供了原因，但时态错误较明显：谈论童年经历时应使用过去时，如“I didn’t”或“My parents were”。另外，“No, I don’t”应改为“No, I didn’t”，因为问题询问的是过去。后一句“That’s why...”与前面的原因重复，可以删去或换成一个具体细节，使答案更自然、更有效。

例: No, I didn’t. My parents were quite concerned about my safety, so they preferred me to take the bus or walk to school. As a result, I didn’t really have many opportunities to ride a bike as a child.

提案: 回答有明确观点和原因，但原答案在“take a bike to”处未完成，影响连贯性和完整性。可以补充完整例子，例如说明同学骑车上班或上学的情况，并使用逗号、“for example”和“also”等连接词。表达“take a bike”不够自然，建议改为“ride a bike”或“cycle”。此外，“physical well being”应写作“physical well-being”，并且可以加入共享单车或环保等更具体的信息。

例: Yes, bikes are quite popular in China, especially in large cities. Many people ride bicycles to work because cycling helps them stay fit and avoid traffic jams. For example, bike-sharing services are widely available, so commuters can easily rent a bike for short journeys.

× No, I don't because my parents are always worried about my safety so they prefer me to take a bus or just walk to school. That's why I didn't have a bike when I was a child.

✓ No, I didn't because my parents were always worried about my safety, so they preferred me to take the bus or just walk to school. That's why I didn't have a bike when I was a child.

问题描述的是学生小时候的经历，主要时态应使用一般过去时。因为“didn't have”已经明确表示过去，所以前面的“don't”应改为“didn't”；“are always worried”和“prefer”也应分别改为“were always worried”和“preferred”，以保持时态一致。建议回答过去经历时，注意整段回答中的主要动词都使用过去式。