Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Your response repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. Give a clear direct answer (yes/no) with a brief supporting detail. Keep it natural and within 1–3 sentences. Use linking words like "because" or "so" if you add reasons.

例: Yes, I had a small red bike when I was about seven because my parents wanted me to learn balance and independence. It helped me ride to the park every weekend.

提案: Your answer directly addresses the question but is brief and lacks supporting detail. Expand with one or two specific reasons or comparisons using linking words such as "because", "however", or "for example" to make it more informative and natural. Stay within 2–4 sentences.

例: Not really — bikes are not very popular in my country because the roads are busy and people prefer cars for long commutes. However, they are common in some rural areas and among students for short trips.

× Did you have a bike when you were a child?

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.

The student's reply repeats the examiner's question rather than providing an answer. This is a sentence structure issue (type 26). The correction provides a proper affirmative response in the past simple tense to match the question. Suggestion: use subject + past-tense verb (I had) to answer questions about past possession, and include a short affirmative word (Yes/No) if appropriate.

× Not really, bikes are not popular in my country.

✓ Not really, bikes aren't very popular in my country.

The original sentence is understandable but slightly awkward: 'are not popular' is grammatically correct but less natural in spoken English. This fits present tense usage issues (type 6). The correction contracts 'are not' to 'aren't' and adds 'very' to reflect typical spoken nuance. Suggestion: use contractions in spoken responses and add modifiers like 'very' when indicating a degree of popularity; keep present simple for general facts.