Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: 你的回答太简短，缺乏细节和扩展。按照评分标准，先用主题句直接回答，然后用1–2句具体细节支持（如原因、例子或对比），并使用连接词使表达更自然流畅。尽量把答案控制在最多5句内。

例: No, I didn't. My family couldn’t afford one when I was young, so I usually walked to school or took the bus. Occasionally I borrowed a neighbor’s bike on weekends, which felt exciting because cycling felt like a small adventure.

提案: 你的回答未完成且表达含糊。需要先用明确的主题句直接回答问题，然后用具体细节支持（例如在哪些人群或城市更流行、原因或例子），并使用连接词连接观点。注意语句完整，避免突兀中断。

例: Yes, bikes are fairly popular in big cities, especially among students and commuters. However, in rural areas people tend to use motorbikes or cars more because distances are longer and roads are less safe for cyclists.

× Not bad but

✓ Not bad, but I think bikes are quite popular in my country.

学生原句为片段性回答“Not bad but”不完整，缺少主语和谓语，属于句子结构错误。建议给出完整句子并补充信息，例如表达观点时应有主语+谓语+宾语或补充说明。示例改为“Not bad, but I think bikes are quite popular in my country.”（“还可以，不过我认为自行车在我国相当受欢迎。”）。注意在连词“but”前后用逗号连接，并在“but”后补充完整的句子。