Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Your response was a mishearing/repeat of the examiner's question rather than an answer. In Part 1 you should answer directly and briefly. Also avoid repeating the question as a question — provide a clear topic sentence, then one or two supporting details if needed. For example, correct the hearing error and state whether you had a bike, and add a specific detail (age, who gave it to you, how often you used it) using a linking word like “because” or “and.”

例: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. Instead, I usually walked to school or used public transport, and I only learned to ride a bike much later when I was a teenager.

提案: Your answer is direct but too short and lacks supporting detail. To score higher, give a concise topic sentence then one or two specific reasons or examples, using linking words (for example, because, since, or however) to make it coherent. Avoid exceeding five sentences. Mention who uses bikes, where they are used, or a trend to make your answer more informative.

例: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because many people use them for short commutes and exercise. For example, you can see lots of cyclists in cities during rush hour, and some towns have dedicated bike lanes to encourage cycling.

× Did you have a bite when you were a child?

✓ Did you have a bike when you were a child?

The student used 'bite' which is a different word with a different meaning (a small amount of food or to use teeth) instead of 'bike' (bicycle). This is a vocabulary/word choice error rather than a grammar category listed. Replace 'bite' with 'bike' to answer the examiner's question correctly. Suggestion: practice minimal pairs and common nouns to avoid similar sounding-word mistakes.

× Yes, bikes are popular in my country.

✓ Yes, bikes are popular in my country.

This sentence is grammatically correct: plural subject 'bikes' agrees with plural predicate and present simple is appropriate for a general fact. No change is needed.