Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Your answer is grammatically correct and concise, but it is too brief and doesn't follow the Basic Structure guideline of adding supporting details. To improve, give a short topic sentence and then 1–2 specific details (reason, brief example or consequence). Use a linking word to connect the reason.

例: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because my family lived in a busy city where cycling felt unsafe. However, I often borrowed my neighbor's bike on weekends to ride in a nearby park, which helped me learn basic cycling skills.

提案: Good direct answer and natural tone, but it's a bit general. Expand with 1–2 specific supporting details (who uses them, why they are popular, or an example). Use a linking word to link your opinion and reasons to make it coherent.

例: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because many people use them for short commutes and exercise. For example, in large cities there are dedicated cycle lanes and bike-share programs, so students and office workers often choose cycling to avoid traffic and save money.

× No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child.

✓ No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child.

The sentence correctly uses past simple negative to answer a past-tense question; there are no grammar issues that match the provided error types.

× Of course, bikes are very popular in my country.

✓ Of course, bikes are very popular in my country.

The sentence correctly uses present simple to describe a general truth; subject-verb agreement and article/preposition use are correct, so no error from the provided list applies.