Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Your answer is irrelevant to the question and grammatically incorrect for past experience. For Part 1, respond directly with a past-tense topic sentence about whether you had a bike, then add one or two brief supporting details (why, how often you used it, or a memory). Keep it natural, use past tense, and stay within 3–5 short sentences. Use linking words like "because" or "so" if you add reasons.

例: Yes, I did. I had a small red bicycle when I was about seven, and I rode it almost every day around my neighborhood. Because my parents lived near a park, I often practised riding there with my friends.

提案: Your answer is too short and lacks supporting details. Give a clear topic sentence stating your opinion, then add specific reasons or examples to justify it. Use linking words such as "because", "for example", or "however" to connect ideas. Aim for 2–4 concise sentences and include vocabulary relevant to transport and popularity (e.g., "commuting", "eco-friendly", "infrastructure").

例: Yes, I think bikes are quite popular in my country because many people use them for short commutes and exercise. For example, cities have been building more bike lanes recently, which makes cycling safer and more convenient.

× I have one child.

✓ I had one bike.

The student incorrectly used the pronoun 'one' with 'child', which does not answer the examiner's question about having a bike in childhood. This is a misuse of nouns/pronouns and context. The correct response should use the noun 'bike' and the past tense 'had' to match the examiner's question 'Did you have a bike when you were a child?' Suggestion: use the appropriate noun from the question and match tense (past) - e.g., 'I had one bike.'