Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: 回答过于简短，缺乏细节和连贯性。按照评分标准，应该先直接回答，然后提供1-2句支持细节（例如原因、时间或情况），并使用连接词使表达自然流畅。注意句子不宜超过5句，词汇要具体。

例: No, I didn't. When I was a child my family couldn't afford one, so I usually walked or took the bus to school. However, I learned to ride on a neighbor's bike during summer holidays, which was fun and helped build my confidence.

提案: 回答太简短，缺少具体说明和例子。应先直接回答，然后用连接词补充理由、例子或比较（例如在哪些城市更受欢迎、用途或变化趋势），以增强内容的具体性和说服力。保持自然用词和不超过5句。

例: Yes, I do. Bikes are especially popular in big cities because they are a cheap and convenient way to avoid traffic. For example, many people use shared bike services for short trips, and bicycle lanes have become more common in recent years.

× No, I didn't.

✓ No, I didn't.

此句语法正确；回答过去是否拥有交通工具时使用过去时的否定形式“didn't”是恰当的。

× Yes, I do.

✓ Yes, they are.

原句“Yes, I do.” 在回答“Do you think bikes are popular in your country?” 时不合适。问题询问“bikes”（复数）是否在你的国家受欢迎，正确的回应应就“bikes”作陈述，使用主系表结构并与复数主语一致，故改为“Yes, they are.”。建议：在回答关于事物是否普遍/受欢迎时，用与题目主语一致的陈述句（如“they are”或“This is”）而非一般动词“do”。（该改正属于主谓一致/代词使用和句型选择，按给定列表中与代词/主谓一致相关项可视为12或27，但因原句为非对应代词使用，提供更合适的句子。）