Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Jawabanmu hanya mengulang pertanyaan dan tidak memberikan informasi apa pun. Untuk meningkatkan, jawab langsung dengan kalimat topik, tambahkan 1–2 detail pendukung (mis. siapa yang memberi, seberapa sering kamu menggunakannya, kenangan khusus), dan gunakan kata hubung bila perlu. Jaga jawaban tidak lebih dari 5 kalimat dan gunakan kosakata yang relevan (mis. "ride", "neighbourhood", "learned") agar terdengar alami dan koheren.

例: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. My parents bought it for me on my eighth birthday, and I used to ride it every afternoon around the neighbourhood. I learned to balance within a few days and often raced my friends to the park. Those rides helped me become more confident and independent.

× Did you have a bike when you were a child?

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.

The student's response repeated the examiner's question rather than providing an answer. This is a sentence structure and pragmatic issue: the proper reply should include a subject and verb to form a complete declarative sentence. Use past simple tense to match the question (had). Suggestion: respond with a full sentence such as 'Yes, I had a bike when I was a child' or if negative 'No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child.'

× Good job! - Your answer repeats the question and doesn't provide information. As a result it doesn't show fluency, coherence, or vocabulary range.

✓ Instead of repeating the question, answer with information. For example: 'Yes, I had a bike and I used to ride it to school every day,' or 'No, I didn't have a bike, but I often borrowed one from friends.'

The feedback text is not a direct reply to the examiner but a commentary; however the student's behaviour (repeating the question) is a sentence structure/pragmatic error. The correction shows how to produce complete informative sentences using appropriate tense and additional details to demonstrate fluency and coherence. Suggestion: give a full sentence with subject, verb, and supporting details; use past simple (had, used to, didn't) to match the past-time frame.