Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Improve grammar, add a clear topic sentence and one or two specific supporting details. Use past tense for childhood, avoid redundancy, and keep answer within 1–3 sentences. For coherence include a linking word if adding details (e.g., "and" or "so").

例: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. It was a small red bicycle with training wheels, and I rode it to the park with my friends almost every weekend.

提案: Provide a direct topic sentence then add a specific reason or example using linking words. Use plural form when talking generally ("cars"), and expand slightly to show opinion and supporting detail within 1–3 sentences.

例: I don't think bicycles are very popular in my country because many people prefer cars for convenience. For example, long distances and limited bike lanes mean most families choose cars instead.

× Yes, I have a bike when I'm child.

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.

The examiner asked about the past (Did you have...), so the student's reply should use past simple tense. 'Have' should be 'had' (past of have). Also 'I'm child' is incorrect: in past tense it should be 'I was a child'. Use 'I was a child' to indicate past time. Suggestion: match tense to the question and use correct subject + be-form: 'I was a child.'

× I don't think so. The car is more popular.

✓ I don't think so. Cars are more popular.

The question asks generally about bikes in the country, so a general statement should use plural 'cars' and present simple plural verb agreement: 'Cars are more popular.' The student's original 'The car is more popular' incorrectly uses singular definite article and singular noun; this sounds like comparing a specific car, not cars in general. Suggestion: use plural nouns for general statements and keep present simple: 'Cars are more popular.'