Part 1
試験官
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
受験者
Yes, I have. I have a pink bike. It was a very small and beautiful bike. Yeah, I and my sister ride bike in summer and we was very happy.
試験官
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
受験者
Now I think bikes not so popular when before because now child write an electronic bikes and they sit at telephones or iPads.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
スコア: 48.0提案: Сосредоточьтесь на правильном использовании времен, согласовании подлежащего и сказуемого и на более естественном порядке слов. Дайте прямой ответ в настоящем или прошедшем времени (в зависимости от вопроса), затем добавьте 1–2 уточняющих предложения с конкретными деталями (например, кто, когда, где), используя связки (например, because, so, when). Исправляйте ошибки: "Yes, I did" или "Yes, I had"; "My sister and I"; "we rode"; избегайте разговорных междометий (Yeah) в формальной речи.
例: Yes, I did. I had a small pink bike when I was a child. My sister and I used to ride it every summer in the park, and we felt very happy because it allowed us to play outside and explore the neighborhood.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
スコア: 40.0提案: Исправьте грамматику, порядок слов и используйте подходящие связки для причинно-следственных отношений. Начинайте с прямого утверждения, затем объясняйте причину с конкретикой и корректными формами (например, "more/less popular than before"). Уточняйте, о ком именно говорите (children, adults) и избегайте неправильных слов ("write" → "ride").
例: No, I don't think bikes are as popular as they used to be. Many children now prefer riding electric scooters or using smartphones and tablets, so they spend less time outdoors than in the past.
× Yes, I have.
✓ Yes, I did.
The examiner asked about the past (when you were a child). The student used the present tense 'have' which is incorrect for a past event. Use the past simple 'did' to answer a yes/no question about the past. Suggestion: Match the tense of the question by using past simple for events that happened in childhood.
× I have a pink bike.
✓ I had a pink bike.
The sentence describes a bike from childhood, so the past simple 'had' should be used instead of the present 'have'. Suggestion: Use past tense when talking about possessions in the past.
× It was a very small and beautiful bike.
✓ It was a very small, beautiful bike.
The original sentence is understandable but the adjective sequence is better with a comma between coordinate adjectives. Also no article change is needed. Suggestion: Use a comma between two equally modifying adjectives.
× Yeah, I and my sister ride bike in summer and we was very happy.
✓ Yeah, my sister and I rode bikes in the summer and we were very happy.
Multiple errors: pronoun order conventionally places others before 'I' (my sister and I); tense should be past simple 'rode' to match childhood context; 'ride bike' needs plural or article — 'rode bikes' or 'rode a bike' depending on meaning; 'in summer' should be 'in the summer' for habitual past reference; 'we was' is subject-verb agreement error — use 'we were'. Suggestion: Reorder pronouns, use past simple for past habits, use correct pluralization, include definite article for seasons when referring to habitual actions.
× Now I think bikes not so popular when before because now child write an electronic bikes and they sit at telephones or iPads.
✓ Now I think bikes are not as popular as before because children ride electric bikes and they sit with phones or iPads.
multiple issues corrected: 'bikes not so popular when before' is ungrammatical — use comparative structure 'are not as popular as before'; subject-verb agreement: 'bikes are'; 'child' should be plural 'children'; 'write' is wrong verb — use 'ride' for bikes; 'an electronic bikes' mixes singular article with plural noun — use 'electric bikes'; 'sit at telephones or iPads' is awkward — use 'sit with phones or iPads' to express using devices. Suggestion: Use plural forms for general statements about children, correct verbs for actions, and the comparative structure 'not as ... as'.