Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Your answer shows a misunderstanding of the examiner's question — you repeated it but changed a key word (bike → back), which made your reply irrelevant. In Part 1 you should directly answer the question with a short, natural statement (1–3 sentences), and then add a specific detail or example. Also pay attention to listening carefully and pronouncing words clearly so you don't accidentally repeat or mishear the question.

例: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I rode it to school and around my neighborhood almost every day, which helped me become confident on the road.

提案: Again, your reply repeats the examiner's words but with the wrong noun (bags instead of bikes), so it does not answer the question. For this kind of question, give a clear opinion first, then support it with a specific reason or example using linking words (for example, because/since). Also avoid repeating the question — respond naturally and directly.

例: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country because many people use them for short trips and to save money on transport. For example, in cities you can often see dedicated bike lanes and many students commuting by bicycle.

× 'Did you have a back when you were a child?'

✓ 'Did you have a bike when you were a child?'

'Back' is a noun referring to part of the body, not the object asked about in the examiner's question. The student likely misheard 'bike' and used the wrong noun. Replace 'back' with the correct noun 'bike' to match the intended meaning and question context.'

× 'Do you think bags are popular in your country?'

✓ 'Do you think bikes are popular in your country?'

'Bags' is a different noun from 'bikes' and changes the meaning of the question. The examiner asked about bicycles (bikes); the student responded about bags, which is incorrect vocabulary choice. Use 'bikes' to address the original topic and keep the question's meaning consistent.'}]}]}