Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: 答案不够直接和连贯。首先时态错误——应以过去时回答童年经历；其次回答没有正面说明是否有自行车，转而提到小包，信息不相关且含犹豫词（Umm, uh）。建议用一到两句直接陈述有没有自行车，补充一两处具体细节（如自行车颜色、用途或和谁一同骑车），并减少填充词，注意句子长度不超5句。

例: Yes, I had a small bicycle when I was a child. It was pink and had training wheels, and I often rode it around my neighborhood with my older brother.

提案: 回答表达了观点但有逻辑和语法问题。第一句中“because it is very convenient to walk or to go to school”逻辑混乱，应说明骑车方便代替步行或通勤；第二句语法错误（many people prefer to go out in a Greenway），搭配和介词不当。建议先给出直接结论，然后用1–2个具体原因或例子支持，使用连接词如“because”或“for example”，并注意主谓一致和正确搭配。

例: Yes, bicycles are very popular in my country because they are an affordable and convenient way to get around, especially for short trips to school or work. For example, many people cycle along dedicated greenways and bike lanes to avoid traffic and save money on transport.

× Yes I do. Umm, I had a small bag, uh, which was pink.

✓ Yes, I did. Umm, I had a small bag, uh, which was pink.

学生回答第一个问题“Did you have a bike when you were a child?”是一个关于过去的问句，应该使用过去时回答。原句“Yes I do.”使用了一般现在时（do），时态不匹配。改为“Yes, I did.”与过去时问句一致。建议：回答过去发生的事时使用过去时（did / had），并注意在口语中添加逗号或停顿使句子更清晰。

× Sure, the bikes are very popular in my country because it is very convenient to walk or to go to school.

✓ Sure, bikes are very popular in my country because it is very convenient to walk or go to school.

原句中“the bikes”在泛指时不需要定冠词“the”，此外短语“to walk or to go to school”中两个不定式一致性可以简化为“walk or go”。建议：泛指可用复数名词不带冠词，平行结构保持动词形式一致。

× Moreover, in my country there are many people prefer to go out in a Greenway.

✓ Moreover, in my country many people prefer to go out on greenways.

原句中结构混乱：“there are many people prefer...”同时包含存在结构和陈述结构，不符合语法；应去掉“there are”或改为‘there are many people who prefer…’此外介词用法也有问题：通常说“go out on a greenway”或“go out on greenways”，而非“in a Greenway”。“Greenway”不应大写，且若泛指应使用复数或不带冠词。建议：要么使用‘many people prefer to...’要么使用‘there are many people who prefer to...’，并注意介词和大小写。