Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Directness is fine but tense and detail are wrong. Use past tense when referring to childhood, give a brief supporting detail (type of bike, how you used it, or a memory). Keep it natural and within 1–3 sentences, using linking words if adding detail.

例: Yes, I did. I had a small red bicycle with training wheels, and I used to ride it to the park every weekend with my older brother.

提案: Answer is unclear and has many errors (word choice, repetition, incomplete reason). State your opinion clearly, use correct vocabulary ("bikes"), avoid repetition, and give a specific reason or example. Use a linking phrase (e.g., "because" or "mainly because") and complete the thought in 1–3 sentences.

例: Yes, I think bicycles are quite popular in my country, mainly because they are an affordable and convenient way to get around in crowded cities.

× Yes, I do.

✓ Yes, I did.

The examiner asked about the past: 'Did you have a bike when you were a child?' The student used the present tense 'do' instead of the past tense 'did'. This is a tense error (present vs past). Suggestion: match the tense of the question by using the past simple 'did'.

× Yes, I think mikes are popular in in my country because spice is what we.

✓ Yes, I think bikes are popular in my country because they are useful.

This sentence has multiple issues but one clear problem type is incorrect use of pronouns and unclear wording. 'mikes' appears to be a misspelling of 'bikes'. The phrase 'in in' repeats a preposition (also a preposition error but limited to allowed types). 'because spice is what we' is ungrammatical and lacks a clear subject and verb. Replacing with 'they are useful' fixes the pronoun reference to 'bikes' and provides a grammatical, complete clause. Suggestion: correct spelling ('bikes'), remove duplicate 'in', and use a clear clause with a pronoun that refers back to the noun (they) and a verb ('are useful').