Opportunities— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: 回答与问题完全不相关，且语言不清晰。首先要直接回应考官的问题（例如说明是否有机会参加新活动），然后用1–2句具体细节支持（例如参加过的活动、参加的频率、感受或收获）。避免问回与主题无关的问题。建议练习将回答控制在最多5句内，并使用连接词（例如because, for example, when）使表达连贯。

例: Yes, I did have opportunities to try new activities as a child. For example, I joined a local art club once a week and experimented with painting and pottery. Because I tried different hobbies, I learned to be more creative and confident. These experiences also helped me make new friends at school.

提案: 回答过于简短且不相关，未直接给出观点。应先明确表达观点（支持或反对），然后用1–2句具体理由或例子展开。保持句子数量在5句以内，并使用连接词（such as, because, therefore）使逻辑清晰。

例: Yes, I think people should try as many different things as they can because it helps them discover new interests and talents. For instance, trying different sports or arts can reveal hidden skills and broaden one’s social circle. Therefore, experimenting with various activities is valuable for personal growth.

× Is Siri a computer science?

✓ Is Siri a computer scientist?

问题类型（ID 22/26）：原句将“computer science”(计算机科学，名词学科)用作人（Siri）的职业描述，结构不正确。正确表达应使用表示职业的人名词“computer scientist”。另外，疑问句结构“Is + 主语 + 表语？”是正确的，须确保表语类型与主语匹配。建议：当要表明某人从事某职业或身份时，使用以 -ist / -er 结尾的职业名词（如 teacher, scientist），或者使用短语结构如 “works in computer science / studies computer science” 表示从事或学习某一学科。

× In Siri.

✓ Yes, she should try many different things. 或者 Yes, I think people should try many different things.

问题类型（ID 26/11）：原句“In Siri.” 结构不完整，缺主语和谓语，且介词短语用法错误，无法回答考官问题。考官问的是“Should people try as many different things as they can?”，应给出完整的肯定或否定句并表明观点。建议：回答此类一般性观点题时使用完整句子，例如“Yes, people should try as many different things as they can because ...” 或 “No, because ...”。避免只用介词短语或碎片化回答。