Part 1
試験官
Did you like going to parks as a child?
受験者
I didn't like going to parks as a child because my home I lived in the countryside as as a child. There are not a park around my. My home so we usually go to the.
試験官
Do you still like going to parks now?
受験者
I like because I can feel relaxed when I go to parks. Maybe the fresh air or many people. Together, they may feel very relaxed.
試験官
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
受験者
Yes, more parks can can mean more choice. Different angle to different parks can.
試験官
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
受験者
Well, I want to go to Jantan Park in Beijing in the future. I never go to Beijing to visit the park.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
スコア: 30.0提案: 句子不连贯且信息不完整。回答应直接回应问题,先给出观点,再用1-2句具体原因或例子支持。注意句子结构(时态、冠词、代词)和语序,避免重复词(如 as a child)。可以把信息组织成完整的句子,控制在最多5句内。
例: Not really. I rarely went to parks as a child because I grew up in the countryside where there were no nearby parks. Instead, my family and I usually played around our house or in open fields near the village.
Do you still like going to parks now?
スコア: 55.0提案: 回答有观点但表达重复且逻辑不够紧凑。应先给出明确的主题句,然后用连词(because, for example, especially)把理由连贯起来,提供具体细节(如活动、感觉)以丰富内容,避免模糊词(maybe, may)。保持句子简洁自然。
例: Yes, I enjoy going to parks now because they help me relax. The fresh air and greenery calm me, and watching people exercise or chat makes the atmosphere pleasant.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
スコア: 40.0提案: 回答简短且含糊,有重复并且缺少具体理由。应先直接回答,然后给出1-2个具体理由或比较(例如不同类型的公园、改善环境或健康的好处),使用连接词(for example, because, so)使表达更连贯。
例: Yes, I would. More parks would give people more choices for leisure and exercise. For example, some parks could have sports facilities while others offer quiet gardens for reading.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
スコア: 45.0提案: 表达基本清楚但有语法和时态问题(例如 never went / have never been)。应先说出想去的公园并简要说明原因或计划(什么时候、和谁、做什么),使用正确时态与自然短语来丰富回答。
例: Yes, I would like to visit Jantan Park in Beijing someday because I have never been to Beijing and I want to see its famous gardens. I hope to go there next year with my family and take a long walk around the lake.
× I didn't like going to parks as a child because my home I lived in the countryside as as a child.
✓ I didn't like going to parks as a child because I lived in the countryside.
句子结构混乱,原句包含多余和重复的成分(“my home I lived in the countryside as as a child”),应简化为主语+谓语+状语的结构。建议用“I lived in the countryside”做原因状语,从而使句子通顺。
× There are not a park around my.
✓ There was not a park around my home.
原句中存在语序和冠词错误,且时态应与前句过去时一致。正确结构为“There (be) + not + a park + around my home”。因为谈论过去,be动词用过去式was/were;由于主语是单数“a park”,用“was”。另外补全“home”位置。
× My home so we usually go to the.
✓ My home was far, so we usually went to the nearest town to visit parks.
原句不完整,缺少谓语和明确宾语,且时态需与上下文一致(过去)。建议完整表达原因和结果,说明距离远所以去附近城镇,并使用过去时。
× I like because I can feel relaxed when I go to parks.
✓ I like going to parks because I can feel relaxed when I go there.
回答“Do you still like going to parks now?”时应使用动名词短语表达喜好,“I like going to parks”。原句缺少“going”使表达不完整;此外用“there”代替重复的“parks”更自然。
× Maybe the fresh air or many people.
✓ Maybe it's the fresh air or the presence of many people.
原句为片段句,缺谓语和连接结构。“Maybe it's ...”可以引出原因;“many people”作为名词短语需要用“the presence of many people”或“having many people around”。
× Together, they may feel very relaxed.
✓ Together, they make me feel very relaxed.
原句主语与谓语不搭配,导致意义不清。应明确主语(these things/they)对“me”的影响,用“make me feel”。
× Yes, more parks can can mean more choice.
✓ Yes, more parks can mean more choices.
重复动词“can can”为笔误,应去掉多余部分。此外“choice”在此情境下更自然用复数“choices”。
× Different angle to different parks can.
✓ Different parks offer different experiences.
原句语序和结构不完整、含糊。应改为主语+谓语+宾语结构,清楚表达“不同的公园能提供不同的角度/体验”。
× I never go to Beijing to visit the park.
✓ I have never been to Beijing to visit the park.
谈论到目前为止未去过某地,应使用现在完成时“I have never been to Beijing”。原句用一般现在时“I never go”不合语境;同时“been to Beijing”比“go to Beijing”更自然地表示去过某地的经历。
× Well, I want to go to Jantan Park in Beijing in the future.
✓ Well, I want to go to Jantan Park in Beijing in the future.
该句语法基本正确,预置“to”与“in”用法恰当,无需修改。(保留原句)