Part 1
試験官
Did you like going to parks as a child?
受験者
Yes, I did like going to bark as a child. I grew up in a locality when there were several parks around my building and I would like to play on the slides, swings and I could run around a lot as a child.
試験官
Do you still like going to parks now?
受験者
Yes, I still like going box. I usually go for a morning jog for a late night post dinner walk to get my 10,000 steps and I feel like it's still a good place to unwind and get some fresh air.
試験官
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
受験者
I would definitely love to see more parks in the city. It's.
試験官
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
受験者
I can't think of any specific park that I want to go, but definitely if some new park opens up in my neighborhood or anywhere else I would definitely would like to go.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
スコア: 68.0提案: Correct pronunciation errors ("bark" → "park"). Make the answer more concise and natural: start with a clear topic sentence, then add one or two specific supporting details. Use linking words (for example, "because" or "and") to connect ideas and avoid repetition.
例: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. There were several small parks near my building, and I often played on the swings and slides because I enjoyed running around and spending time outdoors.
Do you still like going to parks now?
スコア: 62.0提案: Fix pronunciation/mistakes ("going box" unclear — should be "going to parks"). Make sentences clearer and avoid run-on structure. Use linking words to show purpose (e.g., "to") and sequence (e.g., "or"). Be specific about frequency and activities.
例: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks. I usually visit in the morning for a jog or take a late-night walk after dinner to reach my daily step goal and to relax outdoors.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
スコア: 55.0提案: Complete the thought—avoid leaving sentences unfinished. Provide a reason why you want more parks and add one specific benefit. Keep it to two sentences maximum and use linking words such as "because" or "so".
例: I would definitely love to see more parks in the city because they provide green space for exercise and relaxation. More parks would also improve air quality and make neighborhoods more pleasant.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
スコア: 65.0提案: Avoid repetition ("definitely" twice) and awkward phrasing. Make the response direct: state that you have no particular park in mind, then give a clear condition or preference. Use linking words like "but" or "however" appropriately.
例: I don't have a specific park in mind at the moment, but I would certainly visit any new park that opens in my neighborhood because I enjoy exploring fresh outdoor spaces.
× Yes, I did like going to bark as a child.
✓ Yes, I did like going to parks as a child.
The student wrote 'bark' (singular, and wrong word) instead of 'parks'. This is a word choice and pluralization issue. Use the plural 'parks' to match the context of multiple parks mentioned later. Also ensure correct spelling 'park'. Suggestion: replace 'bark' with 'parks' or 'park' depending on meaning; here 'parks' fits the original question about parks.
× I grew up in a locality when there were several parks around my building and I would like to play on the slides, swings and I could run around a lot as a child.
✓ I grew up in a neighbourhood where there were several parks around my building, and I liked to play on the slides and swings; I could run around a lot as a child.
Problems: incorrect relative word 'when' should be 'where' (location), tense/verb choice 'would like to play' is inappropriate for past habitual action; 'would like' is present conditional. Use past tense 'liked to play' or 'would play'. Also punctuation and conjunctions improved for clarity. Suggestion: use 'where' for places, use past habitual form 'liked to play' or 'would play', and separate ideas with commas or semicolons.
× Yes, I still like going box.
✓ Yes, I still like going to parks.
'going box' is incorrect: 'box' is wrong word and missing preposition. Use 'going to parks' or 'going to the park' depending on meaning. The preposition 'to' is required after 'going' when indicating destination. Suggestion: say 'going to the park' (singular habitual) or 'going to parks' (general).
× I usually go for a morning jog for a late night post dinner walk to get my 10,000 steps and I feel like it's still a good place to unwind and get some fresh air.
✓ I usually go for a morning jog or a late-night post-dinner walk to get my 10,000 steps, and I feel like parks are still a good place to unwind and get some fresh air.
Errors: 'for' repeated incorrectly; missing conjunction 'or' between alternatives; need hyphenation for compound adjectives 'late-night' and 'post-dinner'; 'it's' (singular) is vague—referring to parks (plural), so use 'parks are'. Maintain present simple tense but ensure subject agreement. Suggestion: use 'or' to separate choices, hyphenate compound adjectives, and match verb number to subject ('parks are').
× I would definitely love to see more parks in the city. It's.
✓ I would definitely love to see more parks in the city.
The fragment 'It's.' is incomplete and creates a sentence without a verb or complete thought. Remove the fragment or complete it (e.g., 'It's necessary' or 'It's important'). Suggestion: delete the dangling 'It's.' or finish the sentence with a full clause.
× I can't think of any specific park that I want to go, but definitely if some new park opens up in my neighborhood or anywhere else I would definitely would like to go.
✓ I can't think of any specific park that I want to go to, but if a new park opens up in my neighbourhood or elsewhere, I would definitely like to go.
Problems: missing preposition 'to' after 'go'; redundant modals 'would definitely would like' — double 'would' is incorrect; use 'would like' once; 'some new park' better as 'a new park'; punctuation and word order improved. Suggestion: include 'to' after 'go', avoid repeating modal verbs, use 'a' for unspecified single items, and simplify the sentence for clarity.