Part 1
試験官
Did you like going to parks as a child?
受験者
I actually enjoyed indoor activities as a child, such as playing chess and house with my siblings. I didn't like being out in the sun because I couldn't stand the heat, so pops were not very appealing to.
試験官
Do you still like going to parks now?
受験者
As I've gotten older, I enjoy spending time outdoors more, especially in parks. I like going there in the morning because the fresh air and sunlight are good for my skin and mood, and they help me feel energized for the day. I usually walk for about 30 minutes and sometimes read on a bench every weekend.
試験官
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
受験者
Yes, I would. More parks would break up the concrete landscape and improve air quality. They would also provide pleasant community gathering spots where families can walk, relax and socialise, which would greatly enhance people's quality of life.
試験官
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
受験者
Yes, I've always wanted to visit Central Park in New York because it's a vast, picturesque green space with winding paths, legs, and historic architecture. It seems like the perfect place to relax. I can imagine spending a Sunday afternoon there reading a novel by the reservoir, watching St. perform.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
スコア: 68.0提案: Improve clarity and correctness: start directly with a clear topic sentence, avoid small errors and redundancy, and keep within 3–4 sentences. Mention one or two specific indoor activities and a brief reason for disliking parks, using correct words (e.g. "parks were not very appealing to me").
例: I preferred indoor activities as a child, such as playing chess and make-believe games with my siblings. I avoided parks because I couldn't stand the heat and strong sun. As a result, I spent most afternoons reading or playing board games at home.
Do you still like going to parks now?
スコア: 88.0提案: This answer is strong: clear topic sentence, specific supporting details and examples. To reach a higher score, use a linking word to connect the sentences smoothly and vary vocabulary slightly (e.g. "beneficial" or "invigorating"). Keep it concise (3–4 sentences).
例: Yes, I do. As I've grown older, I enjoy spending time outdoors more, especially in parks, because the fresh air and gentle sunlight boost my mood and energy. I usually take a 30-minute walk and sometimes read on a bench during the weekend, which helps me relax and prepare for the week.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
スコア: 92.0提案: Very good answer: direct, specific reasons and clear benefits. To improve further, add a linking phrase to connect ideas and perhaps a brief concrete example (e.g. community events or playgrounds) to make it more vivid. Keep within 3–4 sentences.
例: Yes, I would. More parks would break up the concrete landscape and improve air quality, and they could also host community events like weekend markets or outdoor exercise classes. As a result, families would have safe places to walk, relax and socialise, improving overall quality of life.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
スコア: 55.0提案: Clarify vocabulary and correct mistakes: avoid typos ("legs", "St.") and be specific. Start with a clear topic sentence naming the park, explain why with one or two concrete details, and finish with a brief imagined activity. Keep it within 3–4 sentences and use linking words like "because" or "for example."
例: Yes, I would like to visit Central Park in New York because it is a large, picturesque park with winding paths and historic buildings. For example, I imagine spending a Sunday afternoon reading a novel by the reservoir and watching people row boats on the lake.
× I actually enjoyed indoor activities as a child, such as playing chess and house with my siblings.
✓ I actually enjoyed indoor activities as a child, such as playing chess and playing house with my siblings.
The original sentence omits the verb 'playing' before 'house', which makes 'house' appear as a noun without clear relation to the verb. Adding 'playing' clarifies the parallel structure with 'playing chess' and corrects the sentence structure. Suggestion: keep parallel verbs when listing similar activities (e.g., 'playing chess and playing house' or 'playing chess and house').
× I didn't like being out in the sun because I couldn't stand the heat, so pops were not very appealing to.
✓ I didn't like being out in the sun because I couldn't stand the heat, so parks were not very appealing to me.
The original contains two problems: 'pops' is a typo for 'parks' and the sentence ends with 'to' missing the object pronoun 'me'. The pronoun 'me' is needed after 'appealing to'. Correction fixes the typo and supplies the missing pronoun. Suggestion: proofread for typos and ensure prepositional phrases have their objects (appealing to me).
× I like going there in the morning because the fresh air and sunlight are good for my skin and mood, and they help me feel energized for the day.
✓ I like going there in the morning because the fresh air and sunlight are good for my skin and mood, and they help me feel energized for the day.
This sentence is grammatically correct; no change is needed. It correctly uses present simple to express habitual actions and general truths. Suggestion: Keep present simple for regular habits and general facts.
× I usually walk for about 30 minutes and sometimes read on a bench every weekend.
✓ I usually walk for about 30 minutes and sometimes read on a bench every weekend.
Sentence correctly uses present simple for habitual actions. No grammatical correction required. Suggestion: maintain consistent tense when describing routines.
× More parks would break up the concrete landscape and improve air quality.
✓ More parks would break up the concrete landscape and improve air quality.
This sentence is correct: 'parks' (plural) matches the plural sense and 'would' is appropriate for hypothetical future. No correction needed. Suggestion: use conditional 'would' correctly for hypothetical improvements.
× They would also provide pleasant community gathering spots where families can walk, relax and socialise, which would greatly enhance people's quality of life.
✓ They would also provide pleasant community gathering spots where families can walk, relax, and socialise, which would greatly enhance people's quality of life.
The original sentence is correct in grammar and verb forms; only a minor stylistic addition of a comma before 'and' may improve clarity. The verbs 'walk, relax, and socialise' are correctly parallel. Suggestion: keep parallel verb forms when listing actions.
× Yes, I've always wanted to visit Central Park in New York because it's a vast, picturesque green space with winding paths, legs, and historic architecture.
✓ Yes, I've always wanted to visit Central Park in New York because it's a vast, picturesque green space with winding paths, lakes, and historic architecture.
The word 'legs' is a typo and does not fit context. Likely intended word is 'lakes'. Replacing 'legs' with 'lakes' corrects the noun and makes the list semantically coherent. Suggestion: check for typos that change meaning and ensure listed nouns suit the context.
× It seems like the perfect place to relax.
✓ It seems like the perfect place to relax.
This sentence is grammatically correct and fits the context. No correction needed. Suggestion: keep simple linking structures for opinions and impressions.
× I can imagine spending a Sunday afternoon there reading a novel by the reservoir, watching St. perform.
✓ I can imagine spending a Sunday afternoon there reading a novel by the reservoir, watching street performers.
The phrase 'watching St. perform' is unclear and appears to be a fragment or typo. Likely intended meaning is 'watching street performers' or 'watching performers'. Replacing with 'street performers' fixes the fragment and provides a clear noun phrase. Suggestion: avoid unclear abbreviations and ensure descriptive phrases are complete and meaningful.