Bike— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Answer the examiner’s question directly rather than repeating it. Say whether you had a bike, then add one or two relevant details, such as when you learned to ride it or where you used it.

Ejemplo: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I learned to ride it when I was about seven, and I often rode it around my neighborhood with my friends.

Sugerencia: Your answer gives a clear opinion and relevant reasons, but the second sentence is unfinished and includes several grammar problems. Use “people mainly travel by bike on narrow, uneven roads” instead of “the way to commute to through… is mostly bikes,” and say “much faster,” not “much more faster.” Complete the comparison by explaining that bikes take up less space. Avoid fillers and repeated words, and keep the answer to a few clear sentences.

Ejemplo: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially in smaller towns. Many people use them because they can travel along narrow, uneven roads more easily than cars. They’re also faster in heavy traffic and take up much less space.

× Yeah, bikes are very popular in our country because the way to commute to through the small roads and umm, uneven surfaces is mostly bikes.

✓ Yeah, bikes are very popular in our country because they are the main way to commute on small roads and uneven surfaces.

The original clause is not structured clearly: the subject 'the way to commute' does not connect grammatically to 'is mostly bikes.' Rephrase it as 'they are the main way to commute' to make the relationship clear. In speaking, avoid fillers such as 'umm' when they interrupt the sentence.

× Yeah, bikes are very popular in our country because the way to commute to through the small roads and umm, uneven surfaces is mostly bikes.

✓ Yeah, bikes are very popular in our country because they are the main way to commute on small roads and uneven surfaces.

The phrase 'commute to through' uses incompatible prepositions. Use 'on' to describe traveling along roads and surfaces. Review which preposition naturally follows the verb or phrase you are using.

× And bikes are much more faster than cars because in the traffic, the cars, they will they take a lot of space, but bikes take very.

✓ And bikes are much faster than cars because cars take up a lot of space in traffic, while bikes take up very little space.

'Faster' is already the comparative form of 'fast,' so it should not be combined with 'more.' Use either 'faster' or 'more fast,' though 'faster' is the natural choice. Avoid using both comparative forms together.

× And bikes are much more faster than cars because in the traffic, the cars, they will they take a lot of space, but bikes take very.

✓ And bikes are much faster than cars because cars take up a lot of space in traffic, while bikes take up very little space.

When referring generally to road congestion, use 'in traffic,' not 'in the traffic.' The definite article 'the' is appropriate when referring to specific traffic already identified, but it is unnecessary in this general statement.

× And bikes are much more faster than cars because in the traffic, the cars, they will they take a lot of space, but bikes take very.

✓ And bikes are much faster than cars because cars take up a lot of space in traffic, while bikes take up very little space.

The phrase 'they will they take' repeats the subject and creates an incomplete, ungrammatical construction. Also, 'bikes take very' is unfinished because 'very' needs to modify an adjective or adverb. Use 'take up very little space' to complete the comparison clearly.