Bike— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Be concise, correct misused words, and organise into a clear topic sentence with supporting details. Avoid redundancy and use linking words. For example, replace 'wrote it only once' with the intended phrase (e.g. 'rode it only once'), say briefly what happened, and give a consequence. Limit to 2–4 sentences, use past tense consistently.

Ejemplo: Yes, I had a bike as a child, but I only rode it once. I fell and hurt myself the first time, so I was scared afterwards and stopped practising. As a result, I never learned to ride properly.

Sugerencia: Answer directly, use clearer vocabulary and reduce hesitations and repetitions. Provide a reason and a specific example, linked with connectors like 'because' and 'therefore'. Keep it to 2–3 sentences and use precise words (e.g. 'unsafe' instead of repeating 'dangerously').

Ejemplo: No, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because traffic laws are not strictly enforced. Therefore, many drivers behave unsafely and bicycle accidents are common, which discourages people from cycling.

× I wrote it only once due to the fact that when I got on the bike I immediately got hurt and as a result I just stopped riding bikes and never got the opportunity to learn how to cycle a bike or use it.

✓ I tried it only once because when I got on the bike I immediately got hurt, so I stopped riding bikes and never had the opportunity to learn how to cycle.

The student used 'wrote' incorrectly; context requires 'tried' (attempted) not a past participle. Also 'got the opportunity' is less natural than 'had the opportunity' and 'learn how to cycle' is more concise than 'learn how to cycle a bike or use it'. Suggest using 'tried' and 'had' for correct meaning and natural past tense usage. Suggested improvements: replace incorrect verb 'wrote' with 'tried', use 'so' to connect cause and effect, and use 'had the opportunity' for clarity.

× Do you think bikes are popular in your country? Student: No, I don't think so because the traffic laws here aren't really strict.

✓ No, I don't think so because the traffic laws here aren't very strict.

The sentence is acceptable but 'really strict' is colloquial; change to 'very strict' for more natural formal speech. No article errors in 'the traffic laws'—this suggestion focuses on natural adjective use. Suggestion: use 'very' instead of 'really' in formal responses.

× So because of that, drivers are drivers really, uh, dangerously.

✓ Because of that, drivers drive very dangerously.

The original repeats 'drivers' and uses incorrect adverb placement 'drivers really, uh, dangerously'. Correct structure places the verb 'drive' and adverb 'very' before 'dangerously'. Remove filler 'uh' in formal answers. Suggest reordering to 'drivers drive very dangerously.'

× As a result, there's a lot of bike crashes, bicycle crashes, and that's the reason why bikes were not that import uh, important or.

✓ As a result, there are many bicycle crashes, and that's why bikes have not been very popular.

Several issues: 'there's' with plural 'crashes' should be 'there are' (subject-verb agreement). Use 'many' instead of 'a lot of' for formality. 'Bike crashes, bicycle crashes' is redundant; choose one term. 'Bikes were not that important' is awkward—meaning is about popularity, so 'not been very popular' fits better and maintains present-perfect to link past events to present state. Also remove filler 'uh'. Suggest using 'there are many bicycle crashes' and 'bikes have not been very popular.'