Bike— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Be concise and correct basic grammar (use correct verbs and articles). Start with a clear topic sentence, then give one or two specific supporting details using linking words. Avoid repetitions and filler words. For example, say you didn’t have a bike, give the main reason (safety concerns), and add one specific detail (how you managed without one).

Ejemplo: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child. My parents wouldn't let me ride because there were frequent accidents on our street, so they were worried about my safety. Therefore I usually walked to school and only borrowed a neighbor’s bike in emergencies.

Sugerencia: Give a clear direct answer, then support it with specific reasons and one short example. Use linking words (for example, however) and avoid contradictory or unclear statements. Fix grammar: use correct relative clauses and verb forms. If mentioning disadvantages, explain one clearly and link to government action if appropriate.

Ejemplo: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because they are affordable and help riders avoid traffic congestion. However, they can be dangerous on busy roads, so the government has introduced stricter safety rules and occasional restrictions in high-risk areas.

× No, I didn't add bike when I was a child.

✓ No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child.

The student used 'add' incorrectly instead of the verb 'have' to indicate possession in the past. Use 'didn't have' for negative past simple of 'have'. Suggestion: replace incorrect verb with 'have' and use past simple negative construction 'didn't have'.

× My parents restricted me from using the bike when I was a child due to any accidents which was taking place uh near my house or the destination.

✓ My parents restricted me from using the bike when I was a child because of accidents that were happening near my house or on the way to my destination.

Several issues: 'due to any accidents' is awkward and 'due to' followed by noun phrase works but 'because of' is clearer here; 'which was taking place' has wrong verb number and tense — plural 'accidents' requires 'were' and 'that' is better than 'which' in restrictive clause; 'the destination' should be 'my destination' or 'on the way to my destination'. Suggestion: use 'because of accidents' or 'due to accidents', change clause to 'that were happening', and use 'on the way to my destination'.

× I used to go by walk and sometimes borrow neighbors bike for any emergency work.

✓ I used to walk and sometimes borrow a neighbor's bike for emergencies.

'Go by walk' is incorrect — use 'walk' or 'go on foot'. 'Neighbors bike' needs possessive form 'neighbor's bike'. 'for any emergency work' is unnatural; use 'for emergencies'. Also add article 'a' before 'neighbor's bike'. Suggestion: use 'I used to walk' or 'I used to go on foot', use the possessive apostrophe, and use plural 'emergencies'.

× So that is why my parents was not giving me the bike.

✓ So that is why my parents were not giving me the bike.

Subject 'my parents' is plural, so the past continuous auxiliary should be 'were' not 'was'. Suggestion: match plural subject with plural verb 'were'.

× Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because many people think having a bike which helps them to avoid traffic and reach their destination very soon.

✓ Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because many people think having a bike helps them avoid traffic and reach their destinations more quickly.

Unnecessary relative pronoun 'which' and incorrect subject-verb agreement/structure: 'having a bike which helps them to avoid' is awkward — use 'having a bike helps them avoid'. Remove 'to' after 'helps' and use plural 'destinations' or 'their destination' consistently; 'very soon' is informal, use 'more quickly'. Suggestion: use 'helps them avoid' and 'reach their destinations more quickly'.

× There are many lot more disadvantages of using the bikes.

✓ There are many more disadvantages to using bikes.

'many lot more' is redundant and ungrammatical. Use either 'many' or 'a lot more', and preposition 'of' with 'disadvantages' is less natural than 'to'. Also 'the bikes' unnecessary definite article; use 'bikes'. Suggestion: say 'many more disadvantages to using bikes' or 'a lot more disadvantages to using bikes'.

× The government for the safety purpose as prohibited or banned vehicles or the sorry not vehicles.

✓ For safety reasons, the government has prohibited or banned some vehicles.

Original sentence has many errors: 'for the safety purpose' should be 'for safety reasons'; 'as prohibited' is incorrect auxiliary and form — use 'has prohibited' or 'has banned'; 'vehicles or the sorry not vehicles' is incoherent — likely meant 'some vehicles' or 'certain vehicles'. Suggestion: rephrase clearly: 'For safety reasons, the government has banned some vehicles.'