Bike— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Be more grammatically correct, concise and direct. Start with a clear topic sentence (e.g. “Yes, I did.”). Then add one or two specific supporting details using linking words. Correct verb forms and article use, and avoid redundancy. For example, say when you had it, why you liked it, and a brief specific memory.

Ejemplo: Yes, I did. I had a red bicycle from about age seven, and I used it to explore my neighborhood and visit friends. Because I loved being outdoors, I spent most afternoons riding to nearby parks and markets, which helped me feel independent.

Sugerencia: Organize your answer: give a clear opinion, then two specific reasons with linking words. Use simpler, accurate vocabulary and correct grammar. Avoid unclear phrases like “missed the time” or “harm to their ties.” Instead mention road conditions, cost, or convenience. Keep it under five sentences and be specific about who uses bikes and why.

Ejemplo: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country. Firstly, they are affordable and economical, so many people prefer them for daily travel. Secondly, because some roads are narrow or poorly maintained, smaller vehicles are more practical and cause less wear and tear. For these reasons, bicycles and motorcycles are common among both younger and older people.

× Yes, of course, when I was in the childhood I having a bike, so because I like to travel through the different places and to explore the world.

✓ Yes, of course, when I was a child I had a bike because I liked to travel to different places and explore the world.

The original mixes past and present forms incorrectly. 'in the childhood' is incorrect; use 'when I was a child'. 'I having a bike' is wrong form — use past simple 'I had'. 'because I like' should be past 'because I liked' to match 'when I was a child'. 'travel through the different places' is awkward; use 'travel to different places'. Suggestion: keep consistent past tense and use natural collocations (a child, had a bike, liked, travel to).

× Yes, of course if you travel by the bike we can able to explore the more world and so and the other on the other hand in the world the roads are not well maintained by the government.

✓ Yes, of course, if you travel by bike you can explore more of the world. However, in many places the roads are not well maintained by the government.

Multiple problems: 'the bike' is unnecessary article — use 'bike'. 'we can able to' is incorrect; use modal 'can' alone ('you can'). 'explore the more world' is incorrect word order and article use — use 'explore more of the world'. Run-on sentence and poor cohesion; split with 'However'. 'on the other hand in the world' is redundant and awkward; use 'in many places'. Suggestion: use correct modal structure (can + base verb), remove unnecessary articles, and improve sentence cohesion.

× So that's why if we're using the bigger vehicles may causing a harm to their ties and to the body structure.

✓ So that's why using bigger vehicles may cause damage to their tires and to the vehicle structure.

Grammar issues: 'if we're using' is unnecessary conditional wording; 'may causing' is wrong — modal + base verb required ('may cause'). 'a harm' should be 'damage' or no article; 'ties' is a misspelling of 'tires' (or 'tyres'); 'body structure' is awkward for vehicles — use 'vehicle structure' or 'frame'. Suggestion: use modal + base verb, correct vocabulary, and simplify the clause.

× So that's why you missed the time using the bikes and so that's why old Indian using it.

✓ Therefore people used to prefer bikes in the past, and many older Indians still use them.

Original is unclear and ungrammatical: 'you missed the time using the bikes' is nonsensical. 'old Indian using it' lacks subject-verb agreement and articles. Correction clarifies intended meaning: 'used to prefer' indicates habitual past, and 'older Indians still use them' expresses present habit. Suggestion: express habitual past with 'used to' and ensure subject-verb agreement and plural agreement for 'people/Indians' and 'bikes'.