Part 1
Examinador
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Candidato
Is low.
Examinador
Do you still like going to parks now?
Candidato
Yes, I like.
Examinador
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Candidato
Yes, I want to see more parks in my city.
Examinador
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Candidato
Yes, I want to go.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Puntuación: 15.0Sugerencia: 답변이 의미 전달이 불분명합니다. 질문에 직접 답하는 주제 문장(예: 'Yes, I enjoyed going to parks when I was a child.')을 사용하고, 이어서 한두 개의 구체적 세부사항(예: 누구와 갔는지, 무엇을 했는지)을 연결어로 이어서 말하세요. 문법적으로 완전한 문장으로 답하세요.
Ejemplo: Yes, I enjoyed going to parks when I was a child. For example, I often went there with my parents and we would have picnics and play on the swings, which made those visits really fun.
Do you still like going to parks now?
Puntuación: 40.0Sugerencia: 답은 긍정이지만 너무 짧고 구체성이 없습니다. 주제 문장을 유지한 뒤 이유나 빈도 등의 추가 정보를 연결어로 덧붙이세요(예: 'because', 'so'). 2~3문장으로 간결하게 설명하고 자연스러운 표현을 사용하세요.
Ejemplo: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks because they are peaceful and good for exercise. For instance, I often go for a jog there in the mornings, which helps me relax before work.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Puntuación: 55.0Sugerencia: 응답은 명확하지만 더 설득력 있는 이유와 구체적 사례가 필요합니다. 'because'나 'so that' 같은 연결어로 왜 더 필요한지 설명하고, 어떤 종류의 공원이 좋은지(예: 어린이 놀이터, 산책로) 구체적으로 말하세요.
Ejemplo: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because they improve air quality and give people places to relax. For example, having more parks with walking trails and playgrounds would benefit families and encourage outdoor activities.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Puntuación: 30.0Sugerencia: 대답이 지나치게 간단합니다. 특정 공원 이름이나 유형(예: botanical garden, national park)을 말하고, 언제/왜 가고 싶은지 구체적인 이유를 덧붙이세요. 연결어로 계획을 설명하면 더 자연스럽습니다.
Ejemplo: Yes, I would like to visit the city botanical garden next spring because I enjoy seeing rare flowers. I plan to go with my friend when the cherry blossoms are in bloom.
× Is low.
✓ I used to like going to parks when I was a child.
The student replied with 'Is low,' which is a fragment and does not answer the question. This is a sentence structure error (ID 26). The examiner asked about past preference, so a complete past-tense statement is required. Suggestion: provide a full clause that includes subject and verb and matches past context, for example, 'I used to like going to parks when I was a child.'
× Yes, I like.
✓ Yes, I do.
The student answered with 'Yes, I like,' which is grammatically odd in this context; the correct short answer uses the auxiliary 'do' for present simple (ID 6). The examiner asked a present habit question, so use 'Yes, I do.' or a full sentence 'Yes, I like going to parks.' Suggestion: use auxiliary verbs for short answers in present simple.
× Yes, I want to see more parks in my city.
✓ Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city.
The student used 'I want' which is not wrong but in this polite hypothetical question the examiner used 'Would you like,' so a matching polite modal 'would like' is more appropriate (ID 4). Use 'would like' to express preference politely: 'I would like to see more parks in my city.'
× Yes, I want to go.
✓ Yes, I want to go to them in the future.
The question asks about parks the student wants to go to in the future; the reply 'Yes, I want to go' is short and omits the object and time reference, causing ambiguity (ID 7). To fit the question, include the object and future intention: 'Yes, I want to go to them in the future.' Alternatively use 'Yes, I would like to visit some parks in the future.'