Part 1
Examinador
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Candidato
Yes, definitely. I love to go parks as a child as it was my safe space according to my parents. I used to go to parks after school and we used to meet my friends. I used to love spending time on swings and slides. I used to spend a lot of time over there and burn a lot of energy.
Examinador
Do you still like going to parks now?
Candidato
I would love to go to parks, but to be honest I don't have time to go to parks right now as I have various other things to do such as my studies, my work, and that's why I can't go to parks right now.
Examinador
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Candidato
Umm, I would technically not love to see more parks in my city because there are multiple parks in my society only so I can see a lot of children going to the parks and enjoying their time.
Examinador
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Candidato
For the record, I don't have any park that in my mind that I have to visit in the future, but any park would be fine where there are swings and slides that can recreate my memories from childhood.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Puntuación: 72.0Sugerencia: Your answer is clear and relevant, but contains grammatical errors, repetition (repeating "I used to" many times), and some awkward phrasing ("love to go parks", "safe space according to my parents"). Improve by using correct verb forms, varying sentence beginnings, and adding one specific detail to make it more vivid. Keep it within 3–4 sentences and use linking words to connect ideas.
Ejemplo: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child because they were my safe place. I often went there after school to meet friends, and we would spend hours on the swings and slides. Because of that, I burned off a lot of energy and felt refreshed for homework later.
Do you still like going to parks now?
Puntuación: 66.0Sugerencia: The answer addresses the question but is repetitive and wordy ("go to parks" repeated; "that's why I can't go to parks right now"). Improve by giving a concise topic sentence, one brief reason with linking word, and optionally mention when you might go next. Use varied vocabulary (e.g., "visit parks" or "spend time in parks").
Ejemplo: I would still like to visit parks, but I rarely go at the moment because my studies and work take up most of my free time. However, I try to visit a park occasionally on weekends when I have a break.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Puntuación: 60.0Sugerencia: Your response is understandable but unclear and informal ("technically not love"); also the reason is vague. Improve by stating a clear position (yes/no), then give a specific reason and, if appropriate, a brief suggestion or contrast. Avoid filler words like "Umm" and use natural phrases such as "there are already several parks nearby".
Ejemplo: I don't think we need many more parks because there are already several within my neighborhood, and they are usually busy enough. If anything, I would prefer improving facilities in the existing parks, such as adding benches and lighting.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Puntuación: 68.0Sugerencia: The answer communicates the idea but is slightly wordy and awkwardly phrased ("For the record", "any park would be fine where"). Improve by giving a direct answer, one specific preference or example, and a linking phrase to explain why. This will make the reply sound more natural and concise.
Ejemplo: I don't have a particular park I must visit, but I would like to go to one with traditional playground equipment like swings and slides so I can relive childhood memories.
× I love to go parks as a child as it was my safe space according to my parents.
✓ I loved going to parks as a child because they were my safe space according to my parents.
The sentence describes a past habit, so use past tense 'loved' and the verb + -ing form 'going' after 'love' when referring to activities. 'Go parks' is missing the preposition/article and should be 'going to parks.' Also change 'it was' to 'they were' to agree with plural 'parks.' Use 'because' for clearer cause rather than 'as.'
× I love to go parks as a child as it was my safe space according to my parents.
✓ I loved going to parks as a child because they were my safe space according to my parents.
The phrase 'go parks' needs the preposition 'to' after 'go' (go to parks). Also 'as a child' requires past tense. Fixed overall to correct preposition and tense. Note: This entry overlaps with other corrections but focuses on preposition error.
× I used to go to parks after school and we used to meet my friends.
✓ I used to go to parks after school and meet my friends there.
'Used to' already indicates past habitual action, so repeating 'used to' before the second verb is unnecessary; use the base verb 'meet.' Also add 'there' to clarify location. This corrects tense redundancy and improves fluency.
× I used to love spending time on swings and slides.
✓ I used to love spending time on swings and slides.
This sentence is correct: 'used to' + 'love' and 'spending' (verb + -ing) correctly expresses a past habitual activity. No change needed.
× I used to spend a lot of time over there and burn a lot of energy.
✓ I used to spend a lot of time there and burn a lot of energy.
'Over there' is colloquial and redundant; 'there' is sufficient. Sentence structure and tense are correct otherwise. This simplifies the prepositional phrase.
× I would love to go to parks, but to be honest I don't have time to go to parks right now as I have various other things to do such as my studies, my work, and that's why I can't go to parks right now.
✓ I would love to go to parks, but to be honest I don't have time right now because I have various other things to do, such as my studies and my work.
Repetition of 'go to parks right now' is redundant. 'Because' is clearer than 'as' for reasons. Remove repeated phrases and the unnecessary comma+conjunction 'and that's why.' Keep tense consistent: 'would love' (conditional desire) and 'don't have' (present) are fine together.
× I would technically not love to see more parks in my city because there are multiple parks in my society only so I can see a lot of children going to the parks and enjoying their time.
✓ I wouldn't really want to see more parks in my city because there are already several parks in my neighborhood, and I can see many children going to them and enjoying their time.
'Technically not love' is unnatural; use 'wouldn't really want.' 'Multiple' followed by 'only' is incorrect; 'already several' is clearer. 'Society' is not the right word for 'neighborhood' in this context. 'A lot of' is informal; 'many' is better. Also use pronoun 'them' to refer back to 'parks.' This addresses quantifier misuse and word choice.
× Umm, I would technically not love to see more parks in my city because there are multiple parks in my society only so I can see a lot of children going to the parks and enjoying their time.
✓ I wouldn't really want to see more parks in my city because there are already several parks in my neighborhood, and I can see many children going to them and enjoying their time.
Pronoun reference was unclear: 'the parks' repeated unnecessarily; replace with 'them' to avoid repetition. 'My society' is incorrect; use 'neighborhood.' This correction clarifies pronoun reference and noun choice.
× For the record, I don't have any park that in my mind that I have to visit in the future, but any park would be fine where there are swings and slides that can recreate my memories from childhood.
✓ I don't have any specific park in mind that I have to visit in the future, but any park with swings and slides would be fine because it could recreate my childhood memories.
The original has awkward word order and redundant phrases ('that in my mind that I have to'). Reorder to 'any specific park in mind' and use 'with swings and slides' to describe the park. Use 'could recreate my childhood memories' for natural phrasing. This fixes sentence structure and clarity.