Parks— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Your response did not answer the examiner’s question and appears to be a repetition with a misheard word. For Part 1 you should give a clear, direct answer (yes/no or short statement) and then 1–2 supporting details. Keep it natural and concise, use linking words if you add details, and avoid repetition or unrelated words.

Ejemplo: Yes, I enjoyed going to parks as a child. For example, my parents often took me to play on the swings and have picnics, which I remember fondly because I made many friends there.

Sugerencia: You simply repeated the examiner’s question instead of answering. In Part 1 give a direct response and follow with one or two specific reasons or examples. Use linking words (e.g., "because", "also", "for example") to make your reply coherent.

Ejemplo: Yes, I still like going to parks because they are peaceful and good for exercise. For example, I often walk my dog there on weekends and enjoy the fresh air.

Sugerencia: Again you repeated the question rather than answering. Provide a direct opinion and support it with a reason or brief example. Keep the answer to no more than five sentences and use linking words to connect ideas.

Ejemplo: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because we need more green spaces for families and children. For instance, new small parks could provide safe places for kids to play and for older people to relax.

Sugerencia: The answer is a repetition of the question and gives no information. You should name a park or type of park you want to visit and explain why, using one or two supporting details. Be specific and concise.

Ejemplo: Yes, I would like to visit the national botanical gardens next year because I enjoy seeing rare plants and taking photographs. Also, I’ve heard they host guided tours that explain the different species, which sounds interesting.

× Did you like going to parks as salt?

✓ Did you like going to parks as a child?

The student used the wrong word 'salt' instead of 'child'. This is not a grammatical inflection issue but a lexical error causing the sentence to be meaningless. According to the provided list, this best fits a sentence structure/word choice problem (use ID 26). Suggestion: replace incorrect lexical items with the intended word; here 'child' fits the context. Proofread aloud to catch words that sound similar (salt/child would not, but replace with context-appropriate noun).

× Do you still like going to parks now?

✓ Yes, I still like going to parks now.

The student's answer repeated the examiner's question rather than providing a proper response. The correction supplies a full, grammatically correct answer in present simple tense. Suggestion: for yes/no questions use 'Yes' or 'No' plus a short or full answer (e.g., 'Yes, I still like going to parks now.').

× Would you like to see more parks in your city?

✓ Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city.

The student repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. The correct response uses the conditional/modal structure 'would like' followed by the base verb and appropriate possessive 'my'. Suggestion: answer modal questions by affirming/negating and restating the idea (e.g., 'Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city.').

× Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?

✓ Yes, there are some parks I want to go to in the future.

Again the student echoed the question. A correct reply provides affirmation and uses present simple/infinitive structure 'want to go to' with the existential 'there are' for plural parks. Suggestion: answer existential 'Are there...' questions with 'Yes, there are...' or 'No, there aren't...' and include the relevant clause.