Parks— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Make the answer more direct and grammatically correct: start with a clear topic sentence (Yes/No and reason), limit to 2–3 supporting sentences, and use correct verb tense for past events. Replace vague phrases with specific details (who, what, when).

Ejemplo: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. My family and I visited a nearby park almost every weekend, where I would play on the swings and run around the playground. Those visits made me feel very free and happy.

Sugerencia: Answer directly, use correct present tense, and avoid unclear phrases like 'extent has been below.' Give a concise reason and one specific example (time or season). Keep within 3 sentences and use linking words (but, however).

Ejemplo: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks, but less often than before because summers have become much hotter. For example, I avoid going in July and August and prefer early mornings in spring when the weather is pleasant.

Sugerencia: Be clear and precise: give a direct opinion, then two specific reasons using linking words (because, and). Avoid confusing phrases like 'many trains in the parks'—use correct vocabulary (trees, facilities).

Ejemplo: Definitely. I would like more parks because they would increase green space and improve air quality. Also, more parks would provide places for exercise and family activities, such as playgrounds and walking paths.

Sugerencia: Give a specific example of the type of park and explain why you want to go there. Use clearer vocabulary (spacious lawns, sports courts) and connect ideas with linking words (for example, so). Limit to 2–3 sentences.

Ejemplo: I would like to visit a large park with lots of trees and open lawns. For example, a park that has sports courts and wide grassy areas would be perfect so I could play badminton or tennis and relax in the shade.

× In my memory, I actually went a lot of parks during weekends with my family, but now the opportunity even has been less so.

✓ In my memory, I actually went to a lot of parks on weekends with my family, but now the opportunities have become fewer.

Plural and article errors: 'a lot of parks' needs the preposition 'to' after 'went'; 'during weekends' is less natural than 'on weekends'; 'opportunity' should be plural 'opportunities' to match 'fewer'; 'has been less so' is ungrammatical — use 'have become fewer' for clearer plural agreement and correct verb form.

× I really love to go to parks as a child because I'm free.

✓ I really loved going to parks as a child because I felt free.

Tense and verb form: The time reference 'as a child' requires past tense 'loved' rather than present 'love'. Use the gerund 'going' after 'loved' for natural phrasing. 'I'm free' is present; change to past 'I felt free' to match timeframe.

× I still like going to park tonight, but that kind of extent has been below because now the global temperature has been rise higher and higher.

✓ I still like going to parks now, but I go less often because global temperatures have been rising higher and higher.

Multiple tense and article issues: 'going to park tonight' is wrong for a general statement — use 'going to parks now'. 'That kind of extent has been below' is unclear; replace with 'I go less often'. Use present perfect progressive 'have been rising' for ongoing temperature increase. 'Has been rise' is incorrect verb form.

× It's a little bit hard to go out in summer in the parks, go to the.

✓ It's a little hard to go out in parks during the summer.

Sentence structure and redundancy: Remove the repeated fragment 'go to the.' Use 'in parks' or 'to parks' and 'during the summer' for natural phrasing. Simplify 'a little bit hard' to 'a little hard'.

× Definitely, I'd like to see more parks in my city because I think it is kind of simple that the city has been more greenery and the air condition will be improved.

✓ Definitely, I'd like to see more parks in my city because I think it would be simple for the city to have more greenery and the air quality would improve.

Modal and word choice: 'it is kind of simple that the city has been more greenery' is ungrammatical. Use 'would be simple for the city to have more greenery' and 'air condition' should be 'air quality.' 'Will be improved' can be 'would improve' to express likely result.

× If I can see we can see more parks in the city because there are many trains in the parks.

✓ If we could have more parks in the city, people could enjoy them because there are many trails and facilities in parks.

Sentence structure and vocabulary: The original is confusing. 'If I can see we can see' is redundant and incorrect conditional form. Use a conditional 'If we could have...' Also 'trains' is likely a vocabulary error; 'trails' or 'trees' or 'facilities' may be intended. Adjust to 'trails and facilities' for clarity.

× OK, that's.

✓ OK, that's all.

Sentence fragment: 'OK, that's.' is incomplete. Add 'all' to complete the phrase, making it a proper short response.

× Umm, I'd like to go any park with more greenery, trees and there are more areas we can take place.

✓ Umm, I'd like to go to any park with more greenery and trees and with larger areas where we can spend time.

Preposition and structure: 'go any park' needs 'go to any park'. 'There are more areas we can take place' is ungrammatical; use 'areas where we can spend time' or 'spaces for activities'.

× We can play tennis, like play badminton on that grass, make us relax.

✓ We can play tennis or badminton on the grass and relax.

Verb forms and coordination: Use parallel verbs 'play tennis or badminton'. 'Make us relax' should be expressed as 'and relax' for natural coordination. Remove 'like' in this list to keep structure consistent.