Part 1
Examinador
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Candidato
Yes, of course, I enjoyed going to parks as a child because it was the only entertainment that I got when I was a child. I'm a kid of the 90s and therefore during those times I did not have that much opportunity to enjoy myself with other activities and therefore parks were the only availability that I could get around with.
Examinador
Do you still like going to parks now?
Candidato
Indeed I do. After exhausting working hours at the office being closed in a very tiny room. I indeed enjoy going to parks right now because it helps me to unwind. It helps me to get more fresh air and clear my mind after hectic.
Examinador
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Candidato
My city is a city where a lot of tourists come every year, therefore it gets a bit overcrowded during high seasons. Therefore, seeing more parks would be ideal for unwinding for entertainment purposes and for attracting even more tourists.
Examinador
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Candidato
The only one park that I would like to go to in the future is Parkway that is situated in Barcelona. I love its architecture. It's cloudy. I think that he is the most talented architecture of the 20th century. It Besides that, the park itself incorporates the architect.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Puntuación: 64.0Sugerencia: Be more concise and natural. Start with a clear topic sentence, then add one or two specific details using linking words. Avoid repeating phrases (e.g., "as a child") and phrasing issues like "only availability."
Ejemplo: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. For example, in the 1990s my neighborhood had few entertainment options, so the park was where I played football with friends and learned to ride a bike.
Do you still like going to parks now?
Puntuación: 58.0Sugerencia: Use full, grammatical sentences and combine ideas to avoid choppy speech. Provide specific reasons and use linking words (for example, "because" or "so"). Correct collocations like "exhausting working hours" and "after hectic."
Ejemplo: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks because, after long hours working in a small office, they help me unwind and get fresh air, which clears my mind and reduces stress.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Puntuación: 70.0Sugerencia: Answer directly and avoid repeating connectors. Use varied vocabulary and give a specific reason or example of how more parks would help (e.g., reduce crowding, provide family spaces). Use one linking word to connect cause and effect.
Ejemplo: Yes, I would like more parks in my city because during peak tourist season the streets become crowded, so additional green spaces would give residents and visitors places to relax and help distribute crowds.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Puntuación: 45.0Sugerencia: Clarify which park and who you mean, use correct nouns and pronouns, and give coherent supporting details. Avoid fragmented sentences and incorrect words (e.g., "it's cloudy," "he is the most talented architecture"). Mention the architect's name and describe specific features of the park.
Ejemplo: I would like to visit Park Güell in Barcelona in the future because I admire Antoni Gaudí's architecture; for instance, the colorful mosaics and organic stone structures make the park visually unique and inspiring.
× Yes, of course, I enjoyed going to parks as a child because it was the only entertainment that I got when I was a child.
✓ Yes, of course, I enjoyed going to parks as a child because they were the only entertainment I had when I was young.
Redundant phrase 'when I was a child' repeated; 'parks' plural requires 'they were' and 'had' is a better past-tense verb than 'got'. Remove repetition for clarity. Suggestion: Use concise past-tense expressions and ensure plural agreement with 'they'.
× I'm a kid of the 90s and therefore during those times I did not have that much opportunity to enjoy myself with other activities and therefore parks were the only availability that I could get around with.
✓ I was a child in the 90s, and during that time I did not have many opportunities to enjoy other activities, so parks were the only option available to me.
'I'm a kid of the 90s' mixes present tense with past context; use past 'I was'. 'Those times' better as 'that time'. 'Opportunity' should be plural 'opportunities'. 'Availability' is incorrect noun here; use 'option available'. Avoid redundant 'therefore' twice. Suggestion: Match tense to the time referenced, use plural for countable 'opportunities', and choose the correct noun ('option' not 'availability').
× Indeed I do. After exhausting working hours at the office being closed in a very tiny room.
✓ Indeed I do. After exhausting working hours in a very small, enclosed office, I enjoy going to parks because they help me unwind.
The original fragment 'After exhausting working hours at the office being closed in a very tiny room.' is a sentence fragment and ungrammatical. Rephrase to a complete clause: 'After exhausting working hours in a very small, enclosed office,' and link to main clause. Also 'tiny' and 'closed' need proper ordering and adjective use. Suggestion: Combine clauses into a complete sentence and order adjectives correctly ('small, enclosed office').
× It helps me to get more fresh air and clear my mind after hectic.
✓ It helps me get fresh air and clear my mind after hectic days.
'More fresh air' is unnatural; use 'fresh air'. 'After hectic' is incomplete—'hectic days' or 'a hectic day' is required. Also omit unnecessary 'to' after 'helps me'. Suggestion: Use standard collocations like 'get fresh air' and complete noun phrases like 'hectic days'.
× My city is a city where a lot of tourists come every year, therefore it gets a bit overcrowded during high seasons.
✓ My city attracts many tourists every year, so it gets a bit overcrowded during peak seasons.
Redundant 'My city is a city' should be simplified. 'A lot of' is informal; use 'many'. 'High seasons' is incorrect collocation; use 'peak seasons'. Suggestion: Avoid redundancy and prefer concise, standard collocations.
× Therefore, seeing more parks would be ideal for unwinding for entertainment purposes and for attracting even more tourists.
✓ Therefore, creating more parks would be ideal for relaxation and for attracting more tourists.
'Seeing more parks' is incorrect meaning; use 'creating' or 'having' more parks. 'Unwinding for entertainment purposes' is wordy; 'relaxation' is clearer. 'Even more' is unnecessary when 'more' suffices. Suggestion: Choose verbs that express intended actions ('creating' or 'building') and use concise nouns.
× The only one park that I would like to go to in the future is Parkway that is situated in Barcelona.
✓ The only park I would like to visit in the future is Park Güell in Barcelona.
'The only one park' is incorrect; use 'the only park' or 'the only one' + 'that'. Also 'go to' is informal; 'visit' is better. I suggested Park Güell because 'Parkway' seems wrong for Barcelona; if 'Parkway' is intended, use 'Parkway, which is located in Barcelona.' Suggestion: Use correct determiners ('the only park') and relative clauses ('which is located in...').
× I love its architecture. It's cloudy.
✓ I love its architecture. It's famous.
'It's cloudy' does not logically follow 'I love its architecture' unless referring to weather; likely intended word is 'notable', 'famous', or 'unique'. 'Cloudy' is an adjective describing weather, not architecture. Suggestion: Use adjectives that match the noun semantic field ('famous', 'unique', 'impressive').
× I think that he is the most talented architecture of the 20th century.
✓ I think that he is the most talented architect of the 20th century.
'Architecture' is the field; the person is an 'architect'. Use 'architect' for a person. Also if referring to Antoni Gaudí, use 'he' only if antecedent is clear; otherwise name the person. 'Most talented' is grammatical but could be 'one of the most talented'. Suggestion: Use correct nouns for people ('architect') and ensure clear antecedents for pronouns.
× It Besides that, the park itself incorporates the architect.
✓ Besides that, the park itself reflects the architect's style.
The sentence begins with 'It Besides that,' which is ungrammatical. 'Incorporates the architect' is incorrect—buildings incorporate an architect's designs or style, not the architect. Use 'reflects the architect's style' or 'was designed by the architect.' Suggestion: Start sentences clearly ('Besides that,') and use accurate verbs like 'reflects' or 'was designed by'.