Parks— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: 回答は肯定しているが、文法ミス（used to going → used to go、時制混乱）と冗長さが目立ちます。まずは主題文で直接答え（Yes, I did / I loved going to parks.）を提示し、続けて具体的な補足を1〜2文で述べる練習をしてください。また、文を完結にまとめ、現在・過去の時制を整えることを意識してください。例えば「友達と何をしていたか」「どんな感情を持っていたか」を具体的に入れるとよいです。

Ejemplo: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. I often went with my friends and we spent hours playing games and exploring the trees. Those visits made me feel happy and free, because we could run around and use our imagination.

Sugerencia: 意図は明確だが文法と語順、語の選択に問題があります（park make me reducing my stress → parks help me relax; in soundingは不明確）。主題文で簡潔に答え、その後で理由を具体的に述べてください。理由を述べる際は接続詞（because, since, as）を一度だけ用い、具体的な描写（花の匂い、静けさ、散歩など）を加えると説得力が増します。

Ejemplo: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks. I sometimes visit them to relax because the flowers and quiet paths help me feel calm and reduce stress. Walking among the trees and listening to birds makes a big difference to my mood.

Sugerencia: 回答はやや逸れており、質問の意図（より多くの公園を見たいか）に直接答えていません。まずは直接的な応答（Yes/No and reason）をし、その後で引越しに関連する状況説明を短く付け加えてください。語彙は research on near the park → look for / explore nearby parks に直すと自然です。

Ejemplo: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because they provide green space for residents. I recently moved to Yokohama and haven't explored the nearby parks yet, so I plan to look for and visit them soon.

Sugerencia: 答えは明確で理由もあるが、文が長くつながっており語順や冠詞の誤りがある（the park which is located in Hokkaido → a park in Hokkaido; beautiful scenery → beautiful). より自然にするには、まず行きたい公園を特定し、その後で理由（花、湖、景色）を具体的に述べ、最後に感想や期待を短く添えてください。

Ejemplo: Yes, I would love to visit a park in Hokkaido. I heard it has many native flowers and clear lakes, and the scenery is said to be stunning. I think it would be a great place to take photos and enjoy nature.

× Of course, yes, I used to going to the park with my friend.

✓ Of course, yes, I used to go to the park with my friend.

'Used to' is followed by the base form of the verb, not the -ing form. Use 'used to go' to describe a repeated past habit; correct the verb form and avoid mixing 'used to' with continuous '-ing'.

× I stayed at.

✓ I stayed there.

The original sentence ends with the preposition 'at' without an object; this creates an incomplete sentence. Replace 'at' with 'there' to form a complete locative phrase: 'I stayed there.'

× I spend time with my friend for a long time.

✓ I spent time with my friend for a long time.

'For a long time' refers to a past period related to 'used to' in the previous sentence, so the past tense 'spent' is required. Using present tense 'spend' is a tense mismatch. Use past simple 'spent' to match the past context.

× I love it.

✓ I loved it.

The student is describing childhood experiences, so the verb should be in the past tense to match the context. 'Loved' aligns with the previous past-tense descriptions.

× Yes, sometimes I go to the park because park make me reducing my stress because there are many flowers in sounding.

✓ Yes, sometimes I go to the park because the park helps reduce my stress and there are many flowers and pleasant sounds.

Several issues: 'park' needs the definite article 'the' when referring to a specific or previously mentioned park. 'Make me reducing' is ungrammatical: use a verb that takes a bare infinitive ('helps reduce') or a gerund correctly ('helps in reducing' but 'helps reduce' is more natural). 'In sounding' is incorrect; likely intended 'pleasant sounds' or 'the sound(s)'. Rephrase to 'helps reduce my stress' and 'there are many flowers and pleasant sounds' for clarity and correct grammar.

× Yes, I'm telling you I moved to Yokohama last year so I have not visited the park near the my house.

✓ Yes, I moved to Yokohama last year, so I have not visited the park near my house.

'I'm telling you' is unnecessary and awkward in this context; remove it. 'the my house' incorrectly combines the definite article 'the' with the possessive 'my'—use only 'my house'. Also add a comma before 'so' to separate clauses.

× So I would like to research on near the park in the future.

✓ So I would like to research the park nearby in the future.

'Research on near the park' uses incorrect prepositions and article. 'Research' does not need 'on' here; use 'research the park' or 'investigate the area near the park'. 'Near the park' with 'the' is awkward after 'on'; better phrasing is 'the park nearby' or 'the area near the park'. Also remove extra articles.

× Yes, I would like to visit the park which is located in Hokkaido and there are many local flowers and lakes.

✓ Yes, I would like to visit a park that is located in Hokkaido; there are many local flowers and lakes there.

When speaking generally about one of many parks, use the indefinite article 'a' or a relative clause 'a park that is located'. Also split into two clauses for clarity and add 'there' to refer to Hokkaido. 'Which' can be used but 'that' is more natural in defining clauses; ensure articles match the intended meaning.

× I heard it is very beautiful scenery.

✓ I heard it has very beautiful scenery.

'It is very beautiful scenery' is awkward because 'scenery' is an uncountable noun and needs a verb that collocates naturally. Use 'has very beautiful scenery' or 'is very beautiful' (without 'scenery'). Using 'has' makes the sentence natural: 'I heard it has very beautiful scenery.'