Part 1
Examiner
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Candidate
No, I don't have bike when, uh, when I was a child because I'm too angry. We don't have any uh, capacity to drive bike or there is no rules to drive bike, uh, when uh, we are, uh, a kid.
Examiner
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Candidate
S bikes are very popular in my country of many people, especially students and daily commuters Use them to travel to work or school because they are cheap to maintain and take a very little space making them easy to park.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Score: 32.0Suggestion: Answer directly with correct tense and clear reason. Keep it concise (1–3 sentences), avoid hesitations and incorrect words like “angry” or “capacity” here. Use linking words (e.g., because, so) and specific details (who, why).
Example: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child because my family couldn’t afford one. Also, there were safety concerns and no local rules or training for children to ride, so my parents preferred I walk or take public transport.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Score: 68.0Suggestion: Start with a clear topic sentence, then add a couple of specific reasons using linking words (e.g., because, therefore). Correct minor grammar and pronunciation, and split into 2–3 concise sentences. Include an example or statistic if possible.
Example: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country, especially among students and daily commuters. This is because they are cheap to buy and maintain, and they take up very little parking space, so people often use them for short trips to work or school.
× No, I don't have bike when, uh, when I was a child because I'm too angry.
✓ No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because I was too poor.
The original mixes present tense 'don't have' with past time marker 'when I was a child'; this is a tense inconsistency. Also 'have bike' is missing the article 'a', and 'too angry' is likely a wrong adjective for inability to have a bike; I suggest 'too poor' or 'couldn't afford one'. Use past simple consistently for past events: 'didn't have' and 'was'. Ensure articles before singular countable nouns: 'a bike'.
× We don't have any uh, capacity to drive bike or there is no rules to drive bike, uh, when uh, we are, uh, a kid.
✓ We didn't have the opportunity to ride a bike, and there were no rules allowing children to ride when we were kids.
Multiple issues: tense should be past ('didn't have'); countable nouns need articles ('a bike') and 'capacity' is an inappropriate collocation—use 'opportunity' or 'ability'. 'There is no rules' has subject-verb disagreement and incorrect article; correct past: 'there were no rules'. Pronoun/number: 'a kid' vs 'kids' should match 'we' — use 'kids' and past 'were'. Also 'drive bike' is unnatural; use 'ride a bike'. This correction addresses article use, subject-verb agreement, word choice, and tense consistency.
× S bikes are very popular in my country of many people, especially students and daily commuters Use them to travel to work or school because they are cheap to maintain and take a very little space making them easy to park.
✓ Bikes are very popular in my country; many people, especially students and daily commuters, use them to travel to work or school because they are cheap to maintain and take up very little space, which makes them easy to park.
Original has several sentence structure problems: stray 'S' at start, awkward clause order, missing punctuation and connectors, and incorrect verb forms/capitalization ('Use' should be lowercase). 'Take a very little space' is ungrammatical; correct is 'take up very little space'. Add relative clause 'which makes them easy to park' for clarity. Ensure subject-verb agreement and proper capitalization and punctuation.