Bike— Part 1 Report

Suggestion: Cần sửa ngữ pháp cơ bản (thì và danh-từ số nhiều), cấu trúc câu và chọn từ phù hợp hơn. Trả lời nên rõ ràng với một câu chủ đề rồi mở rộng bằng chi tiết cụ thể. Ví dụ: nêu số lượng bằng thì quá khứ, mô tả chiếc xe (loại, màu, bộ phận hỗ trợ) và nói thêm một câu kết về cảm xúc hoặc kết quả. Hạn chế lặp từ và không cần quá nhiều câu (tối đa 4-5 câu).

Example: Yes. I had three bikes when I was a child. At first, my first bike had two training wheels because I was still learning to balance. Later, when I became more confident, my family removed the training wheels and I learned to ride on my own, which made me feel proud.

Suggestion: Cần cải thiện tính mạch lạc và nội dung cụ thể: trình bày một câu chủ đề rõ ràng, theo sau bằng lý do cụ thể và ví dụ. Sửa lỗi ngữ pháp (số ít/ nhiều), tránh lặp từ, và hoàn thiện ý chưa kết thúc. Nên dùng liên từ để kết nối các lý do (for example, because, so) và nêu nhóm người sử dụng hoặc tình huống thực tế.

Example: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country, especially among students. They are affordable and convenient for short trips, so many young people use them to get to school or work. For example, in my city you can see students cycling to classes every morning because it is faster than walking and cheaper than taking a bus.

× Yes, I have totally 3 bike.

✓ Yes, I have a total of 3 bikes.

The noun 'bike' must be plural when referring to more than one; use 'bikes'. Also replace 'totally' with the correct phrase 'a total of' to indicate quantity clearly. Suggestion: use 'a total of + number + plural noun'.

× When I was a child at first my bike have two support wheel at the front.

✓ When I was a child, at first my bike had two support wheels at the front.

The verb 'have' is incorrect for past context; use past tense 'had' (Grammar problem type 9 past participle vs 5 past tense but per list best match is 9 is past participle; however this is a past tense error). Also 'support wheel' should be plural 'support wheels'. Add commas for clarity. Suggestion: use past tense 'had' and plural nouns when more than one.

× When I was grown up my family removed them.

✓ When I grew up, my family removed them.

The phrase 'was grown up' is incorrect; use 'grew up' to express becoming an adult (simple past). Add a comma after the introductory clause. Suggestion: use 'grow up' past simple -> 'grew up'.

× Yes, bike is very popular in my country because for student because they become pretty fast and convenient.

✓ Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because for students they are quite fast and convenient.

Use plural 'bikes' and plural verb 'are' to match (subject-verb agreement). 'Student' should be plural 'students'. 'Become' is incorrect here; use 'are' to describe a general characteristic. 'Pretty' used to mean 'quite' in spoken English; 'quite' is more appropriate in this context. Suggestion: ensure noun plurality and verb agreement and choose appropriate linking verb 'are'.

× Also they are they are not old enough for.

✓ Also, they are suitable for students who are not old enough to drive cars.

The original sentence is ungrammatical and incomplete ('not old enough for' lacks an object). It also repeats 'they are'. Provide a complete idea: what they are 'not old enough for'—for example, driving cars. Suggestion: complete the clause with the object and clarify meaning; avoid repetition.