Part 1
Examiner
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Candidate
As a child, I used to always love going to parks, especially with my parents. I used to really enjoy playing there.
Examiner
Do you still like going to parks now?
Candidate
Maybe not as much as I used to as a child because before I used to go to play and, you know, enjoy my time, but now I think I'd prefer to go on walks and not spend as much time at parks as before.
Examiner
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Candidate
I don't think my city needs any more parks because it's a small city anyways, so putting more parks is just a waste of time.
Examiner
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Candidate
No, I don't think so, because I'm not really that interested in parks.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Score: 78.0Suggestion: Your answer is clear and relevant, but slightly repetitive ("used to" twice) and could include one specific detail to make it more vivid. Keep it within 3–4 sentences and use a linking phrase to add a brief example or reason.
Example: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child, especially when my parents took me on weekends. For example, I enjoyed playing on the swings and having picnics under big trees, which made those outings feel special.
Do you still like going to parks now?
Score: 72.0Suggestion: Good direct response, but it's a bit wordy and contains fillers ("you know"). Simplify the structure, remove filler phrases, and add one specific reason or example using a linking word (e.g., "because", "so").
Example: I still like parks, but not as much as when I was a child because I now prefer brisk walks for exercise. For instance, I usually walk along the riverbank rather than spending hours playing in a park.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Score: 65.0Suggestion: Your opinion is clear but sounds blunt and absolute. Soften your language, give a brief reason or balanced view, and avoid phrases like "waste of time." Use a linking word to explain why and perhaps suggest an alternative benefit.
Example: I wouldn't prioritize more parks in my small city because there is limited space and other needs like affordable housing. However, investing in a few well-maintained green spaces might be more useful than creating many small parks.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Score: 60.0Suggestion: Short and direct but too abrupt. Expand slightly with a concise reason and one brief alternative activity to show fluency and give the examiner more to respond to. Keep it to 1–2 supporting sentences using a linking word like "because" or "so".
Example: Not really, because I'm not very interested in parks; I usually prefer visiting museums or cafés instead. If a friend invited me to a picnic I might go, but generally it's not my priority.
× As a child, I used to always love going to parks, especially with my parents.
✓ As a child, I always used to love going to parks, especially with my parents.
The original places 'always' after 'used to', which is awkward word order. Place adverbs of frequency before 'used to' or between subject and main verb: 'I always used to love...' This improves natural word order and clarity. (Grammar problem type ID matched to 20: incorrect adverb placement.)
× Maybe not as much as I used to as a child because before I used to go to play and, you know, enjoy my time, but now I think I'd prefer to go on walks and not spend as much time at parks as before.
✓ Maybe not as much as I used to as a child, because before I used to go to play and enjoy myself, but now I think I'd prefer to go on walks and not spend as much time in parks as before.
Several adverb/phrase placement and pronoun usage issues: 'go to play' is unnatural—use 'go to play' only in specific contexts; 'enjoy my time' is better as 'enjoy myself'; 'at parks' is acceptable but 'in parks' is more natural for time spent inside parks. Also remove filler 'you know' for clarity. These changes correct adverb placement and pronoun choice. (Grammar problem type ID matched to 20: incorrect adverb placement and 12: pronoun use.)
× I don't think my city needs any more parks because it's a small city anyways, so putting more parks is just a waste of time.
✓ I don't think my city needs any more parks because it's a small city anyway, so creating more parks would be a waste of time.
Use 'anyway' (not 'anyways') in standard English. Also 'putting more parks' is awkward; use 'creating' or 'adding' parks. Changing 'is just a waste' to 'would be a waste' matches the modal/conditional nuance about a hypothetical action. These corrections address adverb form and modal/word choice. (Grammar problem type ID matched to 4: modal verb usage and 20: adverb placement.)
× No, I don't think so, because I'm not really that interested in parks.
✓ No, I don't think so because I'm not really very interested in parks.
'Not really that interested' is colloquial but acceptable; 'not really very interested' is slightly more formal and clearer. Also remove the comma before 'because' to avoid comma splice. This corrects punctuation and refines adverb/adjective use. (Grammar problem type ID matched to 13: incorrect use of adjectives or adverbs and 20: adverb placement.)