Part 1
Examiner
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Candidate
No, I don't like going to parks as a child because I prefer to stay at home. Better than going to perks. And when I was going to park the day was too sunny.
Examiner
Do you still like going to parks now?
Candidate
No, but I want to going to parks but my walks and school projects are really busy.
Examiner
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Candidate
Yes Sir, I like to see beautiful sights and I like breathing cleaner air.
Examiner
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Candidate
Yes sure my homes near at the park. Their park has a beautiful sightseeing and there was a many trees and cleaner airs.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
Score: 40.0Suggestion: 문법과 시제 사용이 부정확합니다. 과거에 대한 질문이므로 과거 시제로 명확히 말해야 하고, 중복 표현과 철자 오류(‘perks’ → ‘parks’)를 고쳐야 합니다. 또한 주제를 바로 답한 뒤 간단한 이유를 연결어로 이어주어야 자연스럽습니다. 예: 주제문(Yes/No) → 이유 → 구체적 상황(언제, 어떻게) 순으로 최대 3문장 내로 말하세요.
Example: No, I didn’t like going to parks when I was a child because I preferred staying at home. Also, many days were very sunny, so it felt uncomfortable to be outside.
Do you still like going to parks now?
Score: 45.0Suggestion: 문법(‘want to going’ → ‘want to go’)과 논리 연결이 어색합니다. 질문에 직접 답한 뒤 이유를 간결한 연결어(‘because’, ‘but’)로 이어 구체적 근거를 한두 가지로 제시하세요. 문장은 2~3개로 제한하면 더 자연스럽습니다.
Example: Not really. I would like to go sometimes, but I’m very busy with walks and school projects, so I rarely have time to visit parks.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
Score: 60.0Suggestion: 존댓말 표현(‘Sir’)은 시험에서는 필요 없습니다. 답변은 직접적이고 구체적으로 만들고 연결어를 활용해 이유를 분명히 하세요. 예를 들어 어떤 점에서 더 좋아할지(휴식, 환경 개선 등)를 하나 더 덧붙이면 좋습니다.
Example: Yes, I would. More parks would offer pleasant sights and cleaner air, and they would also provide peaceful places for people to relax and exercise.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
Score: 50.0Suggestion: 문장 구조와 시제, 소유격(‘my home’s near the park’) 사용을 고치세요. 구체적으로 어떤 공원인지, 무엇을 하고 싶은지(예: 산책, 피크닉)를 한두 문장으로 말하면 더 설득력 있습니다. 명사수 일치(‘a many trees’ → ‘many trees’)도 주의하세요.
Example: Yes. My home is near a park that has beautiful views and many trees. I’d like to walk there often and enjoy the fresh air and scenery.
× No, I don't like going to parks as a child because I prefer to stay at home. Better than going to perks. And when I was going to park the day was too sunny.
✓ No, I didn't like going to parks as a child because I preferred to stay at home. It was better than going to parks. And when I went to the park, the day was too sunny.
학생이 과거의 습관과 선호를 말하고 있으므로 현재 시제가 아니라 과거 시제를 사용해야 합니다. 'I don't like' -> 'I didn't like', 'I prefer' -> 'I preferred', 'when I was going to park' 는 어색한 표현이므로 과거 단순시제 'when I went to the park' 로 고쳐야 합니다. 또한 'perks' 는 철자 오류로 'parks' 로 수정해야 합니다.
× No, but I want to going to parks but my walks and school projects are really busy.
✓ No, but I want to go to parks, but my walks and school projects keep me very busy.
'want' 동사 다음에는 to부정사(부정사원형)가 와야 하므로 'want to going' 은 잘못된 형태입니다. 올바른 형태는 'want to go' 입니다. 또한 문장 연결을 위해 쉼표와 더 자연스러운 표현 'keep me very busy' 를 사용했습니다.
× Yes Sir, I like to see beautiful sights and I like breathing cleaner air.
✓ Yes, sir. I like to see beautiful sights, and I like to breathe cleaner air.
존칭 'Sir' 는 소문자로 'sir' 로 쓰고 구두점이 필요합니다. 'breathing' 은 여기서 일반적인 선호를 말하는 동사로 원형 'breathe' 가 더 적절합니다. 또한 문장 연결을 위해 쉼표와 접속사 사용을 개선했습니다.
× Yes sure my homes near at the park. Their park has a beautiful sightseeing and there was a many trees and cleaner airs.
✓ Yes, sure. My home is near the park. The park has beautiful sights, and there are many trees and cleaner air.
여러 오류가 섞여 있습니다: 'homes' 는 단수인지 복수인지 불분명하지만 문맥상 'my home' 이 맞습니다. 'near at' 은 잘못된 전치사 사용으로 'near' 만 쓰면 됩니다. 'Their park' 은 소유대명사 오류로 자신의 집이라면 'the park' 로 수정합니다. 'a beautiful sightseeing' 는 어색하므로 'beautiful sights' 로 고치고 'there was a many trees' 는 수 일치와 관사 오류이므로 'there are many trees' 로 바꿉니다. 'cleaner airs' 는 불가산명사 'air' 를 사용해 'cleaner air' 로 고쳐야 합니다.