Parks— Part 1 Report

Suggestion: Be clearer and more concise. Start with a direct topic sentence (e.g. "Yes, I loved going to parks as a child."), then add one or two specific details using linking words. Avoid unclear phrases and repetition. Focus on concrete activities and a clear memory.

Example: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. For example, I often spent hours on the slides and riding my bike down gentle slopes. I also remember a famous statue in the park that I always wanted to visit because it was a good meeting point for my friends.

Suggestion: Make a clear, direct response and give specific current activities. Use linking words (however, nowadays, for example) and avoid unclear place names or grammar errors. Keep it to 2–4 sentences and state how your activities differ from childhood.

Example: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks nowadays, but my activities have changed. For instance, I usually use the bike paths for cycling and sometimes practise yoga on the grass. I also like walking there to relax and watch people enjoy the park.

Suggestion: Give a direct opinion and support it with clear reasons. Use linking words (because, so, therefore) and avoid vague phrases. Mention specific benefits (green space, air quality, relaxation) to strengthen your answer.

Example: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because they improve air quality and provide a place to relax. For example, more parks would give people space to exercise and escape traffic noise, which would make the city more pleasant to live in.

Suggestion: Answer directly naming the park, then give two clear, specific reasons you want to visit. Use linking words (for example, because, also) and avoid fragmented sentences. Describe particular attractions or activities to make your answer vivid.

Example: Yes, I would like to visit Stanley Park in Vancouver in the future. For example, I want to cycle along the two-kilometre bike path and see the large pond with ducks and colourful flowerbeds. It sounds like a lovely place to relax and take photographs.

× Yes, I love to go to the park, so I like to slide.

✓ Yes, I loved going to the park, so I liked to go on the slides.

The question asks about childhood (past), so present simple 'love' and 'like' are tense-mismatched. Change to past simple 'loved' and 'liked' to match time frame. Also use 'go on the slides' for natural collocation.

× So over there there are a bunch of slides and also doing a lot of failing days to do like bike riding slopes.

✓ There were a lot of slides there, and many days I would ride my bike down the slopes.

Original sentence is ungrammatical and confusing. Use past tense 'were' to match childhood context and rephrase to a clear subject-verb structure 'I would ride my bike' to express habitual past action.

× And there's one famous statue that I like to see during the visit.

✓ And there was one famous statue that I liked to see during visits.

Again the context is past. Change 'there's' to past 'there was' and 'I like' to past 'I liked'. Use plural 'visits' or 'a visit' for consistency; 'during visits' implies repeated past visits.

× It will start with love to go to Fox Illinois but the activities are changed but we are used to doing the bike roads that are known for yoga or just walking by betrayals.

✓ I used to love going to Fox, Illinois, but the activities have changed; we usually used the bike paths for yoga or for walking.

The sentence mixes future 'will' and present. Since question asks about now, use past habit 'used to' for earlier preference and present perfect 'have changed' for change up to now. 'Bike roads' should be 'bike paths' and 'by betrayals' is unintelligible; likely 'for walking'. Rephrase for clarity and correct prepositions.

× Also the leaving some people over there and through my views.

✓ Also, some people still go there, and it fits with my point of view.

Original lacks clear subject and verb and misuses pronouns. Provide explicit subject 'some people' and verb 'go'. 'Through my views' is unclear; change to 'fits with my point of view' to convey intended meaning.

× Yes, I will definitely look for this if you're going something work on to be held in your parks because the more the cleaner the Liam over his earlier the living days and with the parts you feel a little fresh and can escape a little traffic lifestyle.

✓ Yes, I would definitely support events held in parks, because the cleaner and greener the parks are, the fresher you feel and the better you can escape city traffic.

Original mixes conditional and incorrect future forms and contains many unclear phrases. Use conditional 'would support' to express willingness. Replace unclear fragments with 'cleaner and greener the parks are' and a clear result clause. Correct word choice and sentence structure for clarity.

× I want to go to the store. Lovely, beautiful thought that seemed that was strangely which it will be Vancouver.

✓ I want to go to Stanley Park in Vancouver; it seems lovely and beautiful.

Sentence is disjointed and mixes tenses. 'I want to go' is fine for future desire; clarify the park name and use present 'seems' to describe impression. Remove unnecessary words and correct word order.

× I remember a big part of the two kilometres of the bike phase bikes and it has a very big pond in the center of the park, which are the ducks and beautiful flowers.

✓ I remember a large park with two kilometres of bike paths, and it has a big pond in the center of the park with ducks and beautiful flowers.

Use plural 'bike paths' not 'bike phase bikes'. Match subject and verb: 'a big pond ... with ducks' rather than 'which are the ducks'. Correct singular/plural and preposition use for natural English.

× So definitely.

✓ So I would definitely like to visit it in the future.

Single fragment 'So definitely' is incomplete. Expand to a full sentence that fits the question about future plans and expresses clear intent.