Rules— Part 1 Report

Suggestion: Make the answer more concise, natural and polite; avoid exaggerated or insulting comparisons (e.g., “like animals”). Start with a clear topic sentence, then give one or two specific examples of rules and a brief reason. Use linking words to connect ideas.

Example: Yes. My school has several rules to ensure order and safety. For example, we must wear a uniform and arrive on time. These rules help students stay focused and maintain a respectful learning environment.

Suggestion: Give a clear, structured opinion and explain reasons with proper vocabulary. Avoid unclear words (e.g., “excommunicado”) and filler sounds. Limit to 2–3 sentences and use linking words for coherence.

Example: I think some additional rules could be helpful, but only if they are reasonable. For instance, clearer guidelines on homework and behavior would improve discipline and academic performance.

Suggestion: Respond directly with a clear topic sentence naming a specific teacher, then give brief supporting details about what made them dedicated (methods, commitment, results). Avoid unclear phrases and grammatical errors.

Example: Yes. In ninth grade I had Dr. Ali, a biology teacher who was very dedicated. He stayed after class to answer questions and used hands-on experiments to make lessons interesting.

Suggestion: Give a direct preference then justify with one or two clear reasons and an example. Use correct grammar and linking words to improve clarity.

Example: I prefer fewer, clear rules rather than many strict regulations. For example, rules about safety and attendance are important, but too many minor rules can make students disengaged.

Suggestion: Answer directly and give specific examples of the teacher’s strictness and its effects (positive or negative). Reduce fillers and repetition; use one or two supporting sentences with linking words.

Example: Yes. In tenth grade our math teacher was very strict about homework and punctuality. As a result, many students improved their grades because they completed assignments on time.

Suggestion: State your opinion clearly and support it with specific reasons and a brief example. Avoid vague or emotionally charged language; use linking words to present cause and effect.

Example: No. I would not, because without any rules students might become disruptive and learning would suffer. For example, without attendance policies fewer students might attend classes regularly, harming overall progress.

× Yes, there are a number of rules present in our school or university because without rules the students are like animals and they don't know how to do things or how to manage the things.

✓ Yes, there are a number of rules at my school because, without rules, students would be like animals and would not know how to do things or how to manage things.

The phrase 'present in our school or university' is wordy; use 'at my school'. The conditional idea about consequence requires 'would' (a hypothetical result), so 'students would be' and 'would not know'. Also remove the redundant article 'the' before 'things' and add commas for clarity.

× Yes, it's a big yes, because when there is a rule, we have to follow the thing correctly and very sufficiently because, uh, due to the rules student not be excommunicado.

✓ Yes, absolutely, because when there is a rule, we have to follow it correctly and thoroughly, because without rules students would not be excluded.

Use 'follow it' to refer to 'rule' (pronoun agreement). 'Very sufficiently' is unnatural; use 'thoroughly'. 'Due to the rules student not be excommunicado' is ungrammatical: needed modal/auxiliary and plural subject: 'students would not be excluded' (or 'students would not be expelled'). Avoid incorrect or nonstandard word 'excommunicado'.

× Is there a lots of teachers that I have face in my educational programs like when I when I am in I was in 9th class.

✓ There are a lot of teachers I have faced during my education, for example when I was in 9th grade.

Use 'a lot of' (not 'a lots of'). 'Have face' should be past participle 'have faced' or simply 'I faced' — here simplify to 'I have faced' or 'I faced'. Match tense: 'when I was in 9th class' -> 'when I was in 9th grade'.

× There is a doctor Ali, who teaches biology and yes, they're dead. He's getting.

✓ There is a Doctor Ali who teaches biology, and yes, he is very dedicated.

'They're dead. He's getting.' is nonsensical and mixes pronouns. Use 'he is' to refer to Doctor Ali and provide a clear adjective 'very dedicated' instead of incorrect fragments.

× I suggest to school that they are only a couple of rules, the basic rules that the students have to be followed because excessive rules can make the students bored and not are much punctual to follow that rule.

✓ I would suggest to the school that they have only a couple of basic rules that students must follow, because excessive rules can make students bored and less punctual in following them.

Use 'suggest to the school' (definite article). 'They are only a couple of rules' should be 'they have only a couple of basic rules'. Replace passive 'have to be followed' with active 'must follow'. 'Not are much punctual' becomes 'less punctual'. Use plural 'them' to refer to 'rules'.

× Yes, there there was a time on in 10th class where, uh, we class fellows had a teacher, a math teacher who teaches us a math.

✓ Yes, there was a time in 10th grade when we classmates had a math teacher who taught us math.

Remove duplicate 'there'. Use 'in 10th grade' and 'when' for time clause. 'We class fellows' -> 'we classmates'. Maintain past tense 'taught' to match past event and remove redundant article before 'math'.

× Uh, he's very strict in his subject and uh, also he teaches very strictly.

✓ He was very strict about his subject, and he taught very strictly.

Maintain past tense for a past recollection: use 'was' and 'taught'. Also 'strict in his subject' -> 'strict about his subject'. 'Teaches very strictly' should match past narrative.

× No, because if there is no rules, students going to be uh, aggressive or something very unpleasant, which is not bearable.

✓ No, because if there are no rules, students will become aggressive or do something very unpleasant, which is unacceptable.

Subject-verb agreement with 'rules' requires 'are'. Use future form 'will become' or 'will be' for prediction. 'Going to be' needs auxiliary 'are going to be' but 'will become' is more natural. 'Not bearable' -> 'unacceptable'.

× So rules are the best thing to follow and make the environment healthy.

✓ So rules are the best things to follow and help create a healthy environment.

'Best thing' -> 'best things' to agree with plural 'rules'. Use 'help create' rather than 'make the environment healthy' for natural phrasing.