7 分範例

問題: Should governments provide financial support to start-ups?

思路 1

Yes
是的
考官答案
Yes, I think governments should help start-ups financially. Start-ups are important because they create jobs and help the economy grow. Many new businesses have trouble getting loans from banks, so government support can really make a difference. Also, if these start-ups become successful, they will pay more taxes in the future, which is good for the country.
是的,我認為政府應該在財務上幫助新創企業。新創企業很重要,因為它們創造就業機會並促進經濟成長。許多新企業很難從銀行獲得貸款,所以政府的支持確實能產生很大影響。此外,如果這些新創企業成功,未來將繳納更多稅款,這對國家有利。
Yes, I do believe governments should provide financial support to start-ups. Start-ups are a major source of new jobs and can really drive economic growth. They also bring fresh ideas and innovation, which is essential for any country to stay competitive. Since it's often hard for new businesses to get funding from banks, government support can help reduce the risk for entrepreneurs. Plus, if these start-ups succeed, they’ll contribute more in taxes, which benefits everyone in the long run.
是的,我確實認為政府應該為新創公司提供財務支持。新創公司是創造新工作機會的主要來源,並且能真正推動經濟成長。它們同時帶來新鮮的點子和創新,這對任何國家保持競爭力都至關重要。由於新企業通常很難從銀行獲得資金,政府的支持可以幫助降低創業者的風險。此外,如果這些新創公司成功,它們將繳納更多稅款,從長遠來看,對所有人都有益處。
語法分析
1. 情態動詞:「governments should provide financial support」中使用的「should」表達了意見和建議的能力,這在 IELTS 口語第三部分非常重要。 2. 現在簡單時態:大多數答案使用現在簡單時態(例如,「Start-ups are a major source of new jobs」、「They bring fresh ideas」)來陳述普遍真理和事實,這對這類問題來說是合適的。 3. 條件句:「If these start-ups succeed, they’ll contribute more in taxes」是一個第一條件句,展示了討論可能未來結果的能力。 4. 目標不定詞:「to get funding from banks」、「to stay competitive」──這些說明了做某事的原因,為答案增添了清晰度和細節。
高分詞匯
  • drive economic growth
    推動經濟成長
  • fresh ideas and innovation
    新鮮的想法與創新
  • stay competitive
    保持競爭力
  • reduce the risk
    降低風險
  • entrepreneurs
    企業家
  • contribute more in taxes
    多繳稅款
  • benefits everyone in the long run
    長遠來看對每個人都有好處

思路 2

No
考官答案
No, I don't think it's a good idea for governments to give money to start-ups. There are more important things to spend public money on, like healthcare and education. Also, not all start-ups are successful, so a lot of money could be wasted. Sometimes, people might just use the money without really planning to start a proper business.
不,我不認為政府應該給初創企業資金。公共資金應該用在更重要的事情上,比如醫療保健和教育。而且,不是所有初創企業都能成功,所以可能會浪費很多錢。有時候,人們可能只是拿了錢,卻沒有真正計劃開展一個正規的生意。
Personally, I don't think governments should provide financial support to start-ups. Public funds are limited and should be prioritized for essential services like healthcare and education. There's also a high failure rate among start-ups, so investing in them can be quite risky and might end up wasting taxpayers' money. On top of that, it could create unfair competition for established businesses, and some individuals might exploit the system without any real intention of building a sustainable company.
個人而言,我不認為政府應該為新創企業提供財政支持。公共資金有限,應優先用於醫療和教育等基本服務。新創企業的失敗率也很高,投資其中風險不小,可能最終浪費納稅人的錢。此外,這可能會對已建立的企業造成不公平的競爭,而且有些人可能會利用這個制度,卻沒有真正建立可持續公司的意圖。
語法分析
1. 表達意見的情態動詞:「I don't think governments should provide...」使用 'should' 來表達個人觀點,這是在回答雅思口語第三部分問題時自然且適當的方式。 2. 被動語態:「Public funds are limited and should be prioritized...」使用被動語態來強調動作本身而非執行者,增加句型的多樣性。 3. 條件句結構:「...so investing in them can be quite risky and might end up wasting taxpayers' money。」使用 'might' 和 'can' 表示可能性與風險,是討論潛在結果的良好方式。 4. 使用連接詞的複合句:「On top of that, it could create unfair competition for established businesses, and some individuals might exploit the system...」此句使用連接詞連結多個想法,展現處理較複雜語法的能力。
高分詞匯
  • public funds
    公共基金
  • prioritized
    優先處理
  • essential services
    基本服務
  • healthcare and education
    醫療保健與教育
  • high failure rate
    高失敗率
  • risky
    冒險的
  • wasting taxpayers' money
    浪費納稅人的錢
  • unfair competition
    不公平競爭
  • established businesses
    成熟企業
  • exploit the system
    利用系統
  • sustainable company
    永續公司