7 分範例
問題: Should all scenic spots charge an entry fee?
思路 1
Yes
考官答案
Yes, I think scenic spots should charge an entry fee. The money collected can be used for maintenance and preservation, which is essential to keep these places in good condition. Entry fees can also help control the number of visitors, reducing overcrowding and ensuring a better experience for everyone. Additionally, the funds can be used to improve facilities and services, making the site more enjoyable and safe for visitors.
是的,我認為景點應該收取入場費。所收取的費用可以用於維護和保護,這對於保持這些地方的良好狀態是必不可少的。入場費還可以幫助控制遊客數量,減少擁擠,確保每個人都有更好的體驗。此外,這些資金還可用於改善設施和服務,使景點對遊客來說更加愉快和安全。
思路 2
No
考官答案
I don't think all scenic spots should charge an entry fee. Nature should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial situation. Free access encourages more people to appreciate and connect with nature. Charging fees might limit some people's experiences, especially those who can't afford it. Instead, alternative funding methods like donations or sponsorships could be explored to support these sites.
我不認為所有景點都應該收取門票費用。大自然應該對所有人開放,無論他們的經濟狀況如何。免費進入可以鼓勵更多人欣賞並與自然建立連結。收費可能會限制一些人的體驗,特別是那些負擔不起的人。相反,可以探索捐款或贊助等替代資金來源來支持這些景點。
思路 3
It Depends
視情況而定
考官答案
It really depends on the specific scenic spot. Popular spots might need to charge fees to manage crowds and maintain the area, while lesser-known spots could remain free to attract more visitors. Fees could also be seasonal, with free access during off-peak times to encourage visits. Local residents might receive discounts or free entry, and fees could be waived for educational visits or community events.
這真的取決於具體的景點。熱門景點可能需要收費以管理人潮和維護區域,而較不知名的景點則可能保持免費以吸引更多遊客。費用也可能是季節性的,淡季時免費開放以鼓勵訪客。當地居民可能享有折扣或免費入場,教育參訪或社區活動的費用也可能被免除。