7 分範例
問題: Do you think old buildings should be preserved?
思路 1
Yes
是的
考官答案
Yes, I think old buildings should be preserved. They are important because they hold historical and cultural significance. These buildings are part of our architectural heritage and can even become tourist attractions, which helps the local economy. Plus, old buildings often have unique designs that you don't see in modern architecture. They give us a physical connection to the past, which is really valuable.
是的,我認為老建築應該被保留。它們很重要,因為它們具有歷史和文化意義。這些建築是我們建築遺產的一部分,甚至可以成為旅遊景點,有助於當地經濟。此外,老建築通常具有現代建築中看不到的獨特設計。它們讓我們與過去有了實體的連結,這非常有價值。
思路 2
No
考官答案
I don't think all old buildings should be preserved. Preservation can be very costly and use up a lot of resources. Some old buildings might not even meet modern safety standards, which can be a problem. Also, they might take up space that could be used for new developments. Not every old building has historical significance, and modern buildings can be more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly.
我不認為所有的老建築都應該被保存。保存工作可能非常昂貴,並且消耗大量資源。有些老建築甚至可能不符合現代安全標準,這會成為一個問題。此外,它們可能佔據了可以用於新建設的空間。並不是每一棟老建築都有歷史意義,現代建築在能源效率和環保方面也更加優越。
思路 3
It Depends
視情況而定
考官答案
It really depends on the building. Preservation should be based on the historical and cultural value of the building. Some old buildings can be repurposed for modern use, which is a great way to balance preservation and development. Community input is important in making these decisions. We should also consider the potential for adaptive reuse of old structures, which can give them a new life.
這真的取決於建築物。保存應該基於建築物的歷史和文化價值。有些老建築可以重新用於現代用途,這是一種平衡保存與發展的好方法。社區的意見在做出這些決定時很重要。我們也應該考慮舊建築的適應性再利用潛力,這可以賦予它們新生命。