7 分範例
問題: Should scientists explain the research process to the public?
思路 1
Yes
是的
考官答案
Yes, scientists should explain their research process to the public. It helps people understand science better and builds trust in scientific findings. When people know how science works, they can make better decisions. Plus, it makes science more open and accountable. It might even inspire young people to become scientists. Also, explaining research can help clear up any myths or wrong ideas people might have.
是的,科學家應該向公眾解釋他們的研究過程。這有助於人們更好地理解科學,並建立對科學發現的信任。當人們知道科學如何運作時,他們可以做出更好的決策。此外,這使科學更透明和負責。這甚至可能激勵年輕人成為科學家。同時,解釋研究可以幫助澄清人們可能有的任何迷思或錯誤觀念。
思路 2
No
考官答案
I don't think it's always necessary for scientists to explain their research to the public. The complexity of scientific research can lead to misunderstandings if not communicated properly. There's also the risk of oversimplifying the information, which might not accurately represent the research. Not everyone is interested or has the time to understand these explanations. Plus, scientists might not have the skills to communicate effectively, leading to misinterpretation of their findings.
我不認為科學家總是有必要向公眾解釋他們的研究。科學研究的複雜性如果沒有適當傳達,可能會導致誤解。同時也存在將資訊過度簡化的風險,這可能無法準確反映研究內容。並非每個人都有興趣或時間去理解這些解釋。此外,科學家可能缺乏有效溝通的技巧,導致他們的發現被誤解。
思路 3
It Depends
視情況而定
考官答案
It depends on the research topic and its impact on society. Some research might be too technical for the general public to understand. However, for controversial or high-impact studies, it's important to explain the research process. Public interest and demand can guide how much explanation is needed. It's about finding a balance between being transparent and maintaining the integrity of the scientific work.
這取決於研究主題及其對社會的影響。有些研究可能對一般大眾來說過於專業難以理解。然而,對於具爭議性或高影響力的研究,解釋研究過程是很重要的。公眾的興趣和需求可以指引解釋的程度。這是在透明度與維護科學工作完整性之間尋找平衡。