7 分範例
問題: Is it necessary to provide free public transportation?
思路 1
Yes
是的
考官答案
Yes, I think free public transportation is a good idea. It can help reduce traffic and pollution because more people would use it instead of driving. It also makes transportation accessible for everyone, no matter how much money they have. This is especially helpful for students and people with low incomes, as it helps them save money. Plus, it encourages sustainable living by reducing our carbon footprint.
是的,我認為免費公共交通是一個好主意。它可以幫助減少交通擁堵和污染,因為更多的人會使用它而不是開車。它還使每個人都能使用交通工具,不論他們的經濟能力如何。這對學生和低收入者特別有幫助,因為它可以幫助他們省錢。此外,它通過減少我們的碳足跡來鼓勵可持續生活。
思路 2
No
考官答案
No, I don't think free public transportation is necessary. It would be very expensive for the government to maintain, and this could lead to higher taxes. Also, if it's free, people might not appreciate it and could misuse it, leading to overcrowding and a drop in service quality. The money could be better spent on other important services like healthcare or education.
不,我不認為免費公共交通是必要的。政府維持這項服務的成本將會非常高,這可能造成更高的稅收。此外,如果是免費的,人們可能不會珍惜,並可能濫用,導致擁擠和服務質量下降。這筆錢可以更好地用於其他重要服務,如醫療保健或教育。
思路 3
It Depends
這取決於
考官答案
It depends on the situation. In big cities with lots of people, free public transportation could be very helpful. But in rural areas where not many people use it, it might not be necessary. It's important to test it first with pilot programs to see if it works well. Also, a mix of free and paid services could be considered, like offering subsidies for certain groups. We should look at the long-term benefits for the economy and environment before deciding.
這要看情況。在人口眾多的大城市中,免費公共交通可能非常有幫助。但在使用人不多的農村地區,這可能就不是必要的。重要的是先通過試點計劃來測試它是否運作良好。此外,可以考慮結合免費和收費服務,例如為特定群體提供補貼。在做出決定之前,我們應該考慮對經濟和環境的長期利益。