阅读— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Be more concise, reduce hesitations and contradictions. Start with a clear topic sentence that directly answers the question, then give one or two specific supporting details with linking words. Avoid filler sounds (uh, umm) and keep to 2–4 sentences. Also reconcile the apparent contradiction (used to like vs now don't) smoothly.

範例: I don't read much nowadays. I used to enjoy novels as a child because they let me imagine different worlds, but at the moment I have very little free time, so I rarely read.

建議: Give a clear topic sentence and provide one specific reason with a concrete example. Reduce repetitions and hesitations; use linking words like 'because' or 'for example.' Clarify the final point — what you mean by 'compare' — and avoid vague phrases like 'a lot of purpose.'

範例: I prefer reading on a screen because it is portable and convenient. For example, I can carry my iPad anywhere and use it to read ebooks and quickly compare information or look up unfamiliar words.

建議: Answer directly with a clear structure: state situations requiring careful reading and those that do not. Use linking words like 'for example' and 'however.' Provide complete specific details (e.g., what you check on medicine packaging). Remove hesitations and finish unfinished thoughts.

範例: I need to read carefully when dealing with legal or health-related documents. For example, I check every clause in an employment contract to ensure terms match what was agreed, and I read medicine labels to confirm dosage and expiration date. For routine messages or social media, I usually only skim.

建議: Make your distinction clear and correct any language errors. Use linking words ('for example', 'however') and avoid contradictions (saying contracts long then scanning vs earlier said careful reading). Clarify when you scan vs read in detail and correct grammar (e.g., 'I would scan' not 'I would just scanning'). Keep answers within 2–4 polished sentences.

範例: It depends on the material. For example, I usually scan long legal documents like contracts to find key clauses quickly, but I read novels in detail because I want to understand the plot and characters.

× No, I do not like reading. I used to like reading when I was a child. I like to read novel books and it gives a umm, imaginary, uh, a world that I could be, uh, dive into. However, right now, uh, I don't have the time to read any books at all, so I don't like reading.

✓ No, I do not like reading. I used to like reading when I was a child. I like to read novels and they give me an imaginary world that I can dive into. However, right now I don't have time to read any books at all, so I don't read.

The sentence has several present-tense and noun-number issues. 'Novel books' is incorrect: use the plural noun 'novels' (Grammar problem type 1: Singular and plural issue). 'It gives a ... a world' incorrectly uses singular pronoun for plural subject; change to 'they give me an imaginary world' (subject-pronoun agreement, present tense usage) (Grammar problem type 6: Present tense issue and 27: Subject-verb agreement errors). 'Could be, uh, dive into' mixes modal and verb forms; use the present ability 'can dive into' to match the present tense context (Grammar problem type 7: Future tense issue? Actually choose 6: Present tense issue). Also 'I don't have the time' is acceptable but more natural as 'I don't have time' (article optional; if treated as article error it is stylistic). Suggestion: use correct plural nouns, make verbs agree with their subjects, and use consistent present-tense modal verbs like 'can' for general ability.

× I prefer to read on the screen because I can carry out my devices very easily in, for example, an iPad.

✓ I prefer to read on a screen because I can carry my devices very easily, for example an iPad.

The phrase 'on the screen' is better as 'on a screen' or 'on screens' for general preference (article error as well, Grammar problem type 22: Article errors). 'Carry out my devices' is incorrect; the correct verb is 'carry my devices' (no preposition 'out') (Grammar problem type 11: Incorrect use of prepositions). Also move 'for example' to a natural position. Suggestion: drop 'out' after 'carry' and use the indefinite article 'a' for general statements.

× And it has a lot of purpose, uh, to use an iPad not only to read, but to, uh, compare.

✓ And it has many uses: an iPad is useful not only for reading, but also for comparing.

'A lot of purpose' is not idiomatic; use 'many uses' or 'many purposes' (Grammar problem type 13: Incorrect use of adjectives or adverbs). 'To use an iPad not only to read, but to compare' has incorrect infinitive and parallelism; better: 'is useful not only for reading, but also for comparing' or 'not only for reading but also for comparison.' Suggestion: use parallel structure and collocations like 'useful for' and 'not only... but also...'.

× Uh, when I'm signing a contract for sample and employment contract, I look at every single details of the contract and make sure everything is, uh, is what we mutually agree with the company.

✓ When I'm signing a sample or employment contract, I look at every single detail of the contract and make sure everything is what we mutually agreed with the company.

Several errors: 'a contract for sample and employment contract' is redundant and unclear; use 'a sample or an employment contract' (Grammar problem type 22: Article errors and 1: Singular and plural issue). 'Every single details' should be singular 'every single detail' (Grammar problem type 1). 'Make sure everything is what we mutually agree with the company' has tense and preposition issues: after signing, use past or present perfect depending on context; 'agreed with the company' or 'agree with the company' could work; correct phrasing here is 'what we mutually agreed with the company' or better 'what we agreed with the company' (Grammar problem type 5: Past tense issue and 11: Incorrect use of prepositions). Suggestion: ensure determiners match countable nouns, use correct verb tense for the time reference, and use 'agree with' appropriately.

× Also, after purchasing medicine, I will always read the uh, package and make sure uh, it is.

✓ Also, after purchasing medicine, I always read the package and make sure it is correct.

Mixing future 'I will always read' with a habitual action is unnatural; use simple present 'I always read' for habits (Grammar problem type 6: Present tense issue). 'Make sure it is' is incomplete; specify 'it is correct' or 'it is the right medication' to complete the clause. Suggestion: use simple present for habitual actions and finish clauses with clear complements.

× It depends on what material that we are reading.

✓ It depends on what material we are reading.

The relative pronoun 'that' is unnecessary and ungrammatical in this clause and should be omitted (Grammar problem type 12: Incorrect use of pronouns). The sentence otherwise is acceptable. Suggestion: drop 'that' after 'material' in this context.

× For example, like an employment contract, uh, is very long and very often is written for legal purpose purposes.

✓ For example, an employment contract is very long and is often written for legal purposes.

'For example, like an employment contract' is redundant: use either 'for example' or 'like' (Grammar problem type 16: Incorrect conjunction use / 26: Sentence structure errors). 'Very often is written for legal purpose purposes' has word order and pluralization errors: 'is often written for legal purposes' is correct (Grammar problem type 11: Incorrect use of prepositions and 1: Singular and plural issue). Suggestion: remove redundancy, place 'often' before the verb, and pluralize 'purposes.'

× So, uh, I would just scanning to make sure everything is alright.

✓ So I would just scan to make sure everything is all right.

After 'would' the base verb form 'scan' is required; 'scanning' (the -ing form) is incorrect (Grammar problem type 8: Verb + -ing form). Also use 'all right' (two words) for correctness. Suggestion: use bare infinitive after modal-like 'would' and write 'all right.'

× And, and, but for books, I would, uh, detail really.

✓ But for books, I would read them in detail.

The phrase 'detail really' is ungrammatical; you need the verb 'read' and the expression 'in detail' to indicate detailed reading (Grammar problem type 26: Sentence structure errors and 10: Verb in the present participle form if misused). Suggestion: use the verb 'read' and the prepositional phrase 'in detail' to express thorough reading.