规则— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Your answer is somewhat unclear and incomplete, especially the last part which is confusing. Try to give a clear and complete response with relevant details, and avoid unnecessary or unclear information. Use linking words to connect your ideas logically.

範例: Yes, there are several rules at my school. For example, students must have at least 75% attendance to be eligible for exams. Additionally, students are expected to be punctual and respect teachers. These rules help maintain discipline and ensure good academic performance.

建議: Your answer lacks clarity and contains many hesitations. Try to organize your ideas clearly and use linking words to express contrasting points. Also, avoid filler words and speak confidently.

範例: I believe that while some rules are necessary to keep students disciplined and punctual, having too many rules can be frustrating. Therefore, a balance is important to ensure students benefit without feeling restricted.

建議: Your answer provides some relevant information but has grammatical errors and unclear phrases. Try to use correct grammar and more precise vocabulary. Also, organize your answer with a clear topic sentence and supporting details linked logically.

範例: Yes, I have a teacher who does his job very well. His name is Deepak Srishta, and he taught us economics in grade 12. He regularly assigned homework and praised our efforts, which motivated us to perform better in the future.

× Students have to meet their attendance to participate in exam, otherwise they are not allowed to participate in exam.

✓ Students have to meet their attendance requirements to participate in the exam; otherwise, they are not allowed to participate in the exam.

The sentence lacks the definite article 'the' before 'exam' and needs 'requirements' after 'attendance' to make the phrase grammatically correct and clear.

× Years should be shorter and the news will be trimmed and students should.

✓ The years should be shorter, the news should be trimmed, and students should benefit.

The original sentence is incomplete and unclear. It lacks proper pronouns and verbs to complete the ideas. Adding 'should be' and completing the last clause clarifies the meaning.

× I don't think strength would benefit from more and more rules.

✓ I don't think students would benefit from more and more rules.

'Strength' is incorrectly used here; the intended subject is 'students'. Using the correct noun clarifies the meaning.

× Uh, to some extent, yeah, they give some benefits to students, uh, they, it makes the students punctual, uh, disciplined, but sometimes, in some cases it makes irritated, uh.

✓ To some extent, yes, rules give some benefits to students; they make the students punctual and disciplined, but sometimes, in some cases, they make students irritated.

The sentence has pronoun confusion ('they, it') and missing subjects. Correcting pronouns and adding subjects improves clarity and grammatical correctness.

× Yes, I helped teacher who does his work very well and his name is Deepak Srishta.

✓ Yes, I have a teacher who does his work very well, and his name is Deepak Srishta.

'Helped teacher' is incorrect; it should be 'have a teacher' to indicate possession. This correction aligns with the intended meaning.

× He used to teach us economics in class 12 and 11:00 and 12:00.

✓ He used to teach us economics in class 12 from 11:00 to 12:00.

The prepositions 'from' and 'to' are needed to indicate the time range properly.

× He always used to take his homework daily and according to our work he used to appreciate us which make us perform very well for future.

✓ He always used to assign homework daily, and according to our work, he used to appreciate us, which made us perform very well in the future.

'Take his homework' is incorrect; 'assign homework' is appropriate. Also, 'make' should be 'made' to agree with past tense, and 'for future' should be 'in the future' with the article 'the'.